exa-reliability-patterns

Implement Exa reliability patterns: query fallback chains, circuit breakers, and graceful degradation. Use when building fault-tolerant Exa integrations, implementing fallback strategies, or adding resilience to production search services. Trigger with phrases like "exa reliability", "exa circuit breaker", "exa fallback", "exa resilience", "exa graceful degradation".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers complete, executable TypeScript implementations of five reliability patterns with a useful error-handling table and Exa-specific domain knowledge. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from overlapping concepts across steps and a tangential monitoring section, plus implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Tighten conciseness by consolidating the Step 4 degradableSearch wrapper with the Step 1 fallback chain and Step 2 retry logic, and consider moving the Step 5 SearchQualityMonitor to a reference file since it is peripheral to the core resilience patterns.

Strengthen workflow clarity by adding explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., bolded 'Verify result count meets minResults before returning' gates) and a short validate→retry feedback loop description for the retry and circuit-breaker steps.

Add a one-line pointer at the top of each code step indicating when to use that specific pattern, so Claude can select the right step without reading all five.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient with minimal preamble and purposeful code comments, but Step 4 re-wraps concepts from Steps 1-2 and the Step 5 quality monitor is tangential to core reliability patterns; could be tightened, so it sits at score 2 rather than the lean score 3.	2 / 3
Actionability	Fully executable TypeScript with real Exa API calls, concrete parameters, and a complete circuit-breaker class implementation — copy-paste ready, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Five steps are clearly sequenced with implicit gating (minResults checks, retry limits), but there are no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops framed as checkpoints, placing it at score 2 rather than the explicit-validation score 3.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized single-file skill with clear sections and one-level references to sibling skills (exa-policy-guardrails, exa-architecture-variants) in Next Steps; no nested references, matching the well-organized score-3 anchor for a skill of this scope.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities, gives an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, and lists five natural trigger phrases in a clearly niched Exa-reliability space. It avoids vague fluff and uses appropriate third-person/infinitive voice.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions — "query fallback chains, circuit breakers, and graceful degradation" — matching the score-3 anchor rather than the narrower domain-and-some-actions of score 2.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("Implement Exa reliability patterns...") and when ("Use when building fault-tolerant Exa integrations..."), with an explicit 'Use when' clause satisfying the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Provides five natural trigger phrases ("exa reliability", "exa circuit breaker", "exa fallback", "exa resilience", "exa graceful degradation") giving good coverage of terms a user would say, exceeding the partial-coverage score 2.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clearly niched to Exa reliability with distinct exa-prefixed triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely; matches the score-3 'clear niche' anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Commit: 02d6341

Reviewed: about 18 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.