gamma-prod-checklist
Production readiness checklist for Gamma integration. Use when preparing to deploy Gamma integration to production, or auditing existing production setup. Trigger with phrases like "gamma production", "gamma prod ready", "gamma go live", "gamma deployment checklist", "gamma launch".
76
72%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/gamma-pack/skills/gamma-prod-checklist/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
79%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description excels at trigger term coverage, completeness of when/what framing, and distinctiveness due to the Gamma-specific niche. However, it is weak on specificity — it names no concrete actions, checks, or deliverables that the checklist actually covers, making it hard to know what capabilities the skill provides beyond a vague 'checklist'.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the checklist covers, e.g., 'Verifies authentication configuration, validates rate limits, checks error handling, reviews logging setup, confirms rollback procedures.'
Specify what 'Gamma integration' refers to if it's a particular system or API, to further aid skill selection and reduce ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description says 'production readiness checklist' but does not list any concrete actions or capabilities. It doesn't specify what the checklist covers, what steps are performed, or what aspects of production readiness are evaluated. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (production readiness checklist for Gamma integration) and 'when' (preparing to deploy, auditing existing setup) with explicit trigger phrases provided. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit, natural trigger phrases like 'gamma production', 'gamma prod ready', 'gamma go live', 'gamma deployment checklist', 'gamma launch' — these are terms users would naturally say when needing this skill. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Gamma integration' with 'production readiness' creates a very specific niche. The trigger terms are all Gamma-specific, making conflicts with other skills unlikely. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid production readiness checklist with good actionable code examples and comprehensive coverage of important production concerns. Its main weaknesses are the lack of explicit workflow sequencing (it reads as a flat checklist rather than a guided process with validation gates), and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed implementation guidance into separate files. The inline code comments explaining obvious things slightly reduce token efficiency.
Suggestions
Add an explicit workflow sequence at the top (e.g., 'Complete sections 1-2 before proceeding; run Final Verification Script after each section; do not deploy until all checks pass') to create validation checkpoints.
Remove redundant inline comments like '# 30000: 30 seconds in ms' and '# HTTP 503 Service Unavailable' — Claude already knows these.
Consider splitting detailed implementation patterns (circuit breaker, error handling, health checks) into a separate reference file and keeping SKILL.md as a concise checklist with pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The checklist is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary inline comments (e.g., '# 30000: 30 seconds in ms', '# HTTP 503 Service Unavailable', '# HTTP 200 OK') that explain things Claude already knows. The prerequisites section is somewhat obvious. However, the checklist format itself is inherently dense and useful. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, executable code examples for key areas (client configuration, error handling with Sentry, health checks, circuit breakers, and a bash verification script). The checklist items are specific and actionable rather than vague, and the code is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The checklist is well-organized into numbered sections with clear categories, but it lacks an explicit sequencing or prioritization workflow — it's a flat checklist rather than a sequenced process. There's no validation feedback loop (e.g., 'run verification script, fix failures, re-run') and no guidance on what order to tackle sections or what blocks deployment. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is structured with clear section headers and a logical grouping, but it's a long monolithic file (~130 lines of checklist content) with no references to supporting bundle files for detailed guidance on individual topics like circuit breaker patterns, rate limiting strategies, or GDPR compliance. The external links at the bottom are helpful but the skill itself could benefit from splitting detailed code examples into separate reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3a2d27d
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.