gamma-reference-architecture

Name: gamma-reference-architecture
Rating: 65 (1 reviews)
Author: jeremylongshore

tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill gamma-reference-architecture

github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Reference architecture for enterprise Gamma integrations. Use when designing systems, planning integrations, or implementing best-practice Gamma architectures. Trigger with phrases like "gamma architecture", "gamma design", "gamma system design", "gamma integration pattern", "gamma enterprise".

Review Score

65%

Validation Score

12/16

Implementation Score

73%

Activation Score

40%

SKILL.md

Review

Evals

Generated

12 days ago

Warnings & errors only

Criteria	Score
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)
metadata_version	'metadata' field is not a dictionary
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata
body_steps	No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow

Overall Assessment

This is a solid reference architecture skill with excellent actionability through concrete TypeScript examples and good progressive disclosure. The main weaknesses are some unnecessary verbosity (Prerequisites section, explanatory text Claude doesn't need) and missing validation/verification guidance for implementing these architectural patterns.

Suggestions

Remove the Prerequisites section - Claude already understands microservices, cloud architecture, and event-driven systems
Add a validation checklist or verification steps for each pattern (e.g., 'Verify queue connection before processing', 'Test cache invalidation')
Trim the component responsibilities table - some entries like 'API Gateway: Auth, rate limiting, routing' state the obvious

Dimension	Score	Reasoning
Conciseness	2/3	The content is reasonably efficient with good use of diagrams and code examples, but includes some unnecessary elements like the Prerequisites section (Claude knows these concepts) and could be tighter in places.
Actionability	3/3	Provides fully executable TypeScript code examples for both service layer and event handler patterns, with concrete implementations that are copy-paste ready including proper imports and configuration.
Workflow Clarity	2/3	Patterns are clearly presented with use cases, but lacks explicit validation steps or checkpoints for implementing these architectures. No guidance on verifying the integration works correctly or error recovery procedures.
Progressive Disclosure	3/3	Well-structured with clear sections progressing from simple to complex patterns, appropriate external references at the end, and a clear 'Next Steps' pointer to related content. Content is appropriately organized without deep nesting.

Overall Assessment

This description suffers from a critical lack of specificity about what the skill actually does - it describes a category ('reference architecture') rather than concrete capabilities. While it includes explicit trigger terms and a 'Use when' clause, the vague 'what' undermines its usefulness for skill selection. The Gamma-specific terminology provides some distinctiveness but the abstract language makes it unclear what actions Claude would take when using this skill.

Suggestions

Replace 'Reference architecture for enterprise Gamma integrations' with specific actions like 'Generates architecture diagrams, creates integration configs, validates API schemas for Gamma systems'
Add concrete deliverables or outputs the skill produces (e.g., 'produces deployment templates', 'creates data flow diagrams', 'generates boilerplate code')
Include more natural user phrases beyond technical jargon, such as 'connect to gamma', 'gamma setup', 'how to integrate gamma'

Dimension	Score	Reasoning
Specificity	1/3	The description uses vague, abstract language like 'reference architecture', 'designing systems', and 'best-practice architectures' without listing any concrete actions. It never specifies what the skill actually does (e.g., generate diagrams, create config files, validate schemas).
Completeness	2/3	Has a 'Use when...' clause addressing when to use it, but the 'what' portion is extremely weak - 'reference architecture' doesn't explain what actions the skill performs. The when is present but the what is essentially missing.
Trigger Term Quality	2/3	Includes explicit trigger phrases like 'gamma architecture', 'gamma design', 'gamma integration pattern', which are relevant keywords. However, these are somewhat technical/jargon-heavy and may not reflect how users naturally speak (e.g., missing simpler terms like 'set up gamma', 'connect gamma').
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	2/3	The 'Gamma' specificity helps distinguish it from generic architecture skills, but terms like 'designing systems' and 'planning integrations' are broad enough to potentially conflict with other system design or integration skills.