granola-cost-tuning
Optimize Granola costs and select the right pricing plan. Use when evaluating plans, reducing costs, or maximizing value from Granola subscription. Trigger with phrases like "granola cost", "granola pricing", "granola plan", "save money granola", "granola subscription".
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill granola-cost-tuning70
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear 'when to use' guidance. The main weakness is the lack of specific concrete actions - it describes the goal (optimize costs, select plan) but not the specific capabilities (e.g., compare features, analyze usage patterns, calculate ROI). The explicit trigger phrase list is a strong feature that aids skill selection.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 specific concrete actions like 'compare plan features', 'analyze usage patterns', 'calculate cost per meeting' to improve specificity
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Granola costs/pricing) and general actions (optimize costs, select pricing plan), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'compare plan features', 'calculate usage-based costs', or 'identify unused features'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (optimize costs, select pricing plan) and when (evaluating plans, reducing costs, maximizing value) with explicit trigger phrases listed separately. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'granola cost', 'granola pricing', 'granola plan', 'save money granola', 'granola subscription'. Good coverage of variations users might naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche - Granola-specific pricing optimization. The product name 'Granola' in all triggers makes it highly unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides comprehensive cost optimization guidance for Granola but suffers from verbosity and lack of truly actionable content. The ROI calculators and comparison tables are informative but could be condensed or moved to reference files. The content would benefit from more concrete, executable guidance rather than template-style markdown blocks.
Suggestions
Convert ROI calculator markdown templates into actual executable Python scripts that take inputs and produce calculations
Move detailed comparison tables and competitor analysis to a separate REFERENCE.md file, keeping only the decision matrix in the main skill
Add explicit validation steps to the 'Usage Monitoring' workflow (e.g., 'Verify export completed before deleting old data')
Condense the plan selection guidance into a single decision tree rather than multiple separate strategy sections
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity like the detailed ROI calculator examples and competitor comparisons that Claude could derive. The markdown tables and checklists add bulk that could be condensed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides structured guidance with decision matrices and checklists, but lacks executable code or commands. The 'calculations' are markdown templates rather than actual scripts, and many sections describe what to do rather than providing copy-paste ready actions. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in sections like 'Storage Management' and 'Usage Monitoring' but lack explicit validation checkpoints. The monthly review checklist is helpful but doesn't include feedback loops for error recovery or verification steps. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections with a logical flow, but the skill is monolithic with ~200 lines that could benefit from splitting detailed calculations and comparisons into separate reference files. External links are provided but internal file references are minimal. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
75%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 12 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_output_format | No obvious output/return/format terms detected; consider specifying expected outputs | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.