groq-core-workflow-a
tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill groq-core-workflow-aExecute Groq primary workflow: Core Workflow A. Use when implementing primary use case, building main features, or core integration tasks. Trigger with phrases like "groq main workflow", "primary task with groq".
Validation
75%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
42%This skill has a well-organized template structure with good progressive disclosure and clear section organization. However, it is essentially a skeleton with no actual executable content - all code blocks are placeholders, error handling is generic, and the workflow steps contain no real instructions. The skill cannot be used in its current state.
Suggestions
Replace all placeholder code comments ('// Step 1 implementation') with actual executable TypeScript code showing real Groq API usage
Populate the error handling table with real Groq API errors, their actual causes, and specific solutions
Add concrete examples with real input/output showing what the workflow actually accomplishes
Remove or condense the prerequisites section - Claude doesn't need to be told to have 'understanding of core concepts'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The structure is reasonable but contains placeholder content ('// Step 1 implementation') that adds no value. The prerequisites section explains things Claude would know, and some sections like 'Output' are verbose without substance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | All code blocks are empty placeholders with comments like '// Step 1 implementation' and '// Complete workflow example'. The error handling table has placeholder values ('Error 1', 'Cause', 'Solution'). Nothing is executable or copy-paste ready. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and sequenced (Initialize, Execute, Finalize), but there are no validation checkpoints, no feedback loops for error recovery, and the actual step content is missing entirely. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with clear sections, appropriate references to external resources and related skills (groq-core-workflow-b), and one-level-deep navigation. Content is well-organized for a skill file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Activation
32%This description fails to communicate what the skill actually does, relying entirely on placeholder language like 'Core Workflow A' and 'primary use case' that provide no meaningful information. While it attempts proper structure with trigger phrases, the content is too vague for Claude to make informed skill selection decisions. The description needs complete rewriting with concrete actions and domain-specific terminology.
Suggestions
Replace placeholder terms ('Core Workflow A', 'primary use case', 'main features') with specific concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'Query Groq LLM API, process streaming responses, handle rate limiting').
Add natural trigger terms users would actually say based on what Groq is used for (e.g., 'fast inference', 'LPU', 'Groq API', 'low-latency LLM').
Define the distinct niche by explaining what makes this skill different from other API or workflow skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague, abstract language like 'primary workflow', 'Core Workflow A', 'main features', and 'core integration tasks' without specifying any concrete actions. No actual capabilities are described. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | Has a 'Use when' clause and trigger phrases, but the 'what' is essentially undefined - 'Core Workflow A' and 'primary use case' are placeholders, not actual descriptions of functionality. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'groq' as a relevant keyword and provides some trigger phrases, but the terms are artificial ('groq main workflow', 'primary task with groq') rather than natural phrases users would actually say. Missing domain-specific terms about what Groq actually does. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Extremely generic terms like 'primary workflow', 'main features', and 'core integration' could apply to virtually any skill. Only 'groq' provides any distinctiveness, but without explaining what Groq does, conflicts are likely. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.