groq-reference-architecture
Implement Groq reference architecture with model routing, streaming pipelines, and fallbacks. Use when designing new Groq integrations, reviewing project structure, or establishing architecture standards for Groq applications. Trigger with phrases like "groq architecture", "groq best practices", "groq project structure", "how to organize groq", "groq design".
84
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly defines its scope around Groq reference architecture, lists concrete capabilities, and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user phrases. It uses proper third-person voice and is concise without being vague. The description effectively distinguishes itself from other potential skills through its specific domain focus.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'model routing', 'streaming pipelines', and 'fallbacks' as part of implementing a Groq reference architecture. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (implement Groq reference architecture with model routing, streaming pipelines, and fallbacks) and 'when' (designing new Groq integrations, reviewing project structure, establishing architecture standards) with explicit trigger phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'groq architecture', 'groq best practices', 'groq project structure', 'how to organize groq', 'groq design'. These cover a good range of natural user queries. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive due to the specific 'Groq' domain focus combined with architecture-specific terms like 'model routing', 'streaming pipelines', and 'fallbacks'. Unlikely to conflict with generic coding or other API integration skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a highly actionable skill with complete, executable TypeScript implementations for Groq integration patterns. Its main weaknesses are the monolithic structure (all code inline rather than referenced) and the lack of validation/verification steps between the build stages. The time-sensitive model pricing and speed data could become stale quickly.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints between steps, e.g., 'Test the client connection before proceeding' or 'Verify fallback triggers correctly with a simulated 429 response'.
Move detailed code implementations to separate referenced files (e.g., MODELS.md, MIDDLEWARE.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with the architecture diagram and brief code snippets.
Mark model pricing/speed numbers as potentially outdated and reference the Groq pricing page as the source of truth.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly comprehensive but includes some verbosity—the architecture diagram, while useful, is large, and the model registry includes specific pricing/speed numbers that may become stale. Some sections like the overview paragraph could be tighter. However, most content is code-focused and earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every step provides fully executable TypeScript code with proper imports, types, and complete implementations. The code is copy-paste ready with concrete model IDs, error handling, caching logic, and streaming patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced (1-5), building from model registry to router to middleware to fallback to streaming. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints—no instructions to test each component, verify the client connects, or validate the fallback chain works before deploying. For an architecture involving fallback chains and rate limiting, verification steps would be important. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is mostly monolithic—all code is inline in a single file rather than being split into overview + detailed references. The tables at the end and the 'Next Steps' reference to groq-multi-env-setup show some progressive disclosure, but the bulk of the skill (~200+ lines of code) could benefit from being referenced rather than inlined. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
70e9fa4
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.