tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill guidewire-migration-deep-diveDeep dive into Guidewire migration strategies including self-managed to Cloud, legacy system migrations, data migration, and integration cutover planning. Trigger with phrases like "guidewire migration", "cloud migration", "legacy migration", "data migration guidewire", "cutover planning".
Validation
69%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (668 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 11 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
27%This skill attempts to be comprehensive but suffers from severe verbosity and poor organization. The content includes useful migration patterns and code examples, but buries them in excessive interface definitions and boilerplate. The lack of progressive disclosure means Claude must process 500+ lines when a concise overview with references to detailed sub-skills would be far more effective.
Suggestions
Split into separate skill files: MIGRATION_ASSESSMENT.md, DATA_MIGRATION.md, CUTOVER_PLANNING.md, VALIDATION.md with this file as a brief overview linking to them
Reduce code examples to essential patterns only - remove interface definitions and show only the key implementation logic Claude needs
Add explicit validation checkpoints as numbered workflow steps (e.g., '3. **Validate**: Run MigrationValidator.validateMigration() - only proceed if all checks pass')
Remove explanatory comments in code that describe what the code does - Claude can read the code directly
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is extremely verbose at 500+ lines with extensive boilerplate code, interface definitions, and explanatory comments that Claude doesn't need. Much of this could be condensed to key patterns and references. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete TypeScript and Gosu code examples that are mostly executable, but many are framework/interface definitions rather than copy-paste ready implementations. Some code is incomplete (missing helper method implementations). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-phase migration lifecycle is clearly sequenced with a visual diagram, and cutover phases include verification steps. However, validation checkpoints are embedded in code rather than explicit workflow steps, and there's no clear 'validate -> fix -> retry' feedback loop for the overall migration process. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a monolithic wall of text with all content inline. The external resource links at the bottom are generic documentation references, not structured skill files. Content that should be in separate files (data migration details, cutover planning, validation framework) is all embedded. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Activation
82%This description has strong trigger term coverage and completeness with explicit activation guidance. However, it lacks concrete action verbs (using vague 'deep dive into' instead of specific capabilities) and some trigger terms are generic enough to potentially conflict with other migration-related skills.
Suggestions
Replace 'Deep dive into' with specific concrete actions like 'Plan and execute Guidewire migrations' or 'Analyze migration paths, create cutover plans, and map data transformations'
Qualify generic terms to reduce conflict risk: change 'cloud migration' to 'Guidewire Cloud migration' and 'data migration' to 'Guidewire data migration' in the trigger list
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Guidewire migration) and lists several types of migrations (self-managed to Cloud, legacy system, data migration, integration cutover planning), but uses vague language like 'deep dive into' rather than concrete actions like 'plan', 'execute', or 'analyze'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (migration strategies for various Guidewire scenarios) and when (explicit 'Trigger with phrases like...' clause providing specific activation terms). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'guidewire migration', 'cloud migration', 'legacy migration', 'data migration guidewire', 'cutover planning'. Good coverage of variations users might naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The Guidewire-specific terms provide good distinctiveness, but generic terms like 'cloud migration', 'legacy migration', and 'data migration' could overlap with non-Guidewire migration skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.