Configure Ideogram across development, staging, and production environments. Use when setting up multi-environment deployments, configuring per-environment secrets, or implementing environment-specific Ideogram configurations. Trigger with phrases like "ideogram environments", "ideogram staging", "ideogram dev prod", "ideogram environment setup", "ideogram config by env".
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill ideogram-multi-env-setup83
Quality
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
1.43xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/ideogram-pack/skills/ideogram-multi-env-setup/SKILL.mdDiscovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with explicit trigger guidance and clear 'Use when' clauses. The main weakness is that the specific capabilities could be more concrete - it describes the general domain (environment configuration) but doesn't detail specific actions like 'create config files', 'set API keys', or 'validate environment variables'.
Suggestions
Add more concrete actions to the first sentence, e.g., 'Configure Ideogram API keys, endpoints, and rate limits across development, staging, and production environments'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Ideogram configuration) and mentions actions like 'setting up multi-environment deployments' and 'configuring per-environment secrets', but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like specific configuration steps or outputs. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (configure Ideogram across environments, per-environment secrets, environment-specific configurations) and when (explicit 'Use when' clause with triggers and a 'Trigger with phrases' section). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'ideogram environments', 'ideogram staging', 'ideogram dev prod', 'ideogram environment setup', 'ideogram config by env'. Good coverage of variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche combining 'Ideogram' with 'multi-environment' configuration. The explicit trigger phrases are highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with general environment or configuration skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid, actionable guidance for multi-environment Ideogram setup with executable code examples and good coverage of secret management options. However, it lacks validation checkpoints in the workflow (e.g., testing config loading, verifying secrets are accessible) and could be more concise by removing obvious prerequisites and trimming the output section.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps after each workflow step, e.g., 'Run `npm run config:validate` to verify JSON syntax' or 'Test environment detection with `console.log(getIdeogramConfig())`'
Remove the 'Prerequisites' section or reduce to a single line - Claude can infer these requirements from context
Add a verification step before deployment: 'Confirm correct environment by checking `config.environment` and `config.baseUrl` match expectations'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is mostly efficient with good code examples, but includes some unnecessary sections like the 'Output' bullet list and 'Prerequisites' that state obvious requirements. The feature flags section adds value but could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable TypeScript code, complete JSON configurations, and specific CLI commands for multiple secret managers. All examples are copy-paste ready with clear file paths and structure. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-4 are listed but lack validation checkpoints. No explicit verification that configs are valid JSON, no testing step after environment detection setup, and no feedback loop for troubleshooting misconfigurations before deployment. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but the skill is somewhat monolithic. The error handling table and resources are good, but detailed code blocks could be split into separate reference files for a cleaner overview. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.