langchain-ci-integration
Configure LangChain CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing. Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, or integrating LangChain tests into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "langchain CI", "langchain GitHub Actions", "langchain automated tests", "CI langchain", "langchain pipeline".
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill langchain-ci-integration88
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear 'Use when' guidance. The main weakness is that the capabilities could be more specific about concrete actions (e.g., creating workflow YAML files, configuring test environments). The description uses proper third-person voice and provides good distinctiveness through LangChain-specific terminology.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'create GitHub Actions workflow files', 'configure pytest runners', or 'set up environment secrets for LangChain API keys'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (LangChain CI/CD) and some actions (configure integration, setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'create workflow files', 'set up test runners', or 'configure secrets'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (configure LangChain CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing) and when (setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, integrating tests). Includes explicit 'Use when' clause and 'Trigger with phrases' section. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'langchain CI', 'langchain GitHub Actions', 'langchain automated tests', 'CI langchain', 'langchain pipeline'. Good coverage of variations users might naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche combining LangChain + CI/CD + GitHub Actions. The explicit trigger phrases with 'langchain' prefix make it unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills or other LangChain skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality skill with excellent actionability and conciseness. It provides complete, executable CI/CD configurations without unnecessary explanation. The main weakness is the lack of explicit validation steps - there's no guidance on testing the workflow locally or verifying each step succeeds before proceeding to the next.
Suggestions
Add a validation step after creating the workflow, such as 'Run `act` locally to test the workflow before pushing' or 'Verify workflow syntax with GitHub's workflow validator'
Include a troubleshooting workflow: 'If the workflow fails: 1. Check Actions tab for error logs, 2. Verify secrets are configured, 3. Test locally with pytest first'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, providing complete executable configurations without explaining what CI/CD is or how GitHub Actions work. Every section delivers actionable content without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable YAML workflows, Python configurations, and bash commands are provided. All code is copy-paste ready with complete examples for workflows, pytest config, fixtures, and pre-commit hooks. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. No guidance on verifying the workflow works correctly before proceeding, or how to debug if CI fails after setup. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (Overview, Instructions, Examples, Error Handling, Resources). Content is appropriately structured with a reference to next steps and external documentation links. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
68%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_voice | 'description' should use third person voice; found second person: 'your ' | Warning |
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 11 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.