tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill managing-container-registriesExecute use when you need to work with containerization. This skill provides container management and orchestration with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "containerize app", "manage containers", or "orchestrate deployment".
Validation
81%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
20%This skill is a generic template with no container registry-specific content. Despite being titled 'Container Registry Manager', it contains zero actual registry commands, authentication patterns, image tagging conventions, or registry-specific workflows. The content could apply to literally any IT task and wastes tokens on obvious guidance Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Add concrete container registry commands: docker login, docker push/pull, registry API calls, image tagging patterns (e.g., `docker tag myapp:latest registry.example.com/myapp:v1.2.3`)
Include specific authentication examples for common registries (Docker Hub, ECR, GCR, ACR) with actual credential configuration
Replace generic steps with registry-specific workflows: pushing images, managing tags, cleaning up old images, setting up registry mirrors
Add executable code examples for common tasks like listing images, checking image digests, or automating image promotion between environments
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with generic boilerplate that applies to any task. Explains obvious concepts like 'verify credentials' and 'check network connectivity' that Claude already knows. No container registry-specific content despite the title. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Entirely abstract with no concrete commands, code, or container registry-specific instructions. Phrases like 'Execute implementation' and 'Review current configuration' provide zero executable guidance. No actual registry commands (docker push, docker pull, registry API calls, etc.). | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and sequenced with validation checkpoints mentioned (Step 4), but the workflow is generic project management rather than container registry operations. No specific validation commands or feedback loops for registry-specific operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References external files in Resources section with clear paths, but the main content is a monolithic wall of generic text. The referenced files use placeholder paths ({baseDir}) and may not exist. No clear quick-start section. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Activation
40%This description suffers from vague, buzzword-heavy language that fails to communicate concrete capabilities. While it attempts to provide trigger guidance, the lack of specific actions and missing technology keywords (Docker, Kubernetes) significantly weakens its utility for skill selection. The phrase 'comprehensive guidance and automation' is empty fluff that doesn't help Claude understand what this skill actually does.
Suggestions
Replace vague language with specific actions: 'Write Dockerfiles, build container images, configure docker-compose, deploy to Kubernetes clusters, debug container issues'
Add technology-specific trigger terms users naturally say: 'Docker', 'Kubernetes', 'k8s', 'docker-compose', 'Dockerfile', 'container image', 'pods'
Remove fluff phrases like 'comprehensive guidance and automation' and replace with concrete capabilities
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'container management and orchestration' and 'comprehensive guidance and automation' without listing any concrete actions. No specific capabilities like 'build images', 'run containers', 'write Dockerfiles', or 'configure Kubernetes' are mentioned. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | Has a 'Use when' clause and trigger phrases addressing 'when', but the 'what' is extremely vague - 'container management and orchestration with comprehensive guidance' doesn't explain what the skill actually does. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant trigger phrases ('containerize app', 'manage containers', 'orchestrate deployment') but misses common natural terms users would say like 'Docker', 'Kubernetes', 'k8s', 'docker-compose', 'Dockerfile', or 'pods'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The containerization domain is somewhat specific, but without mentioning specific technologies (Docker, Kubernetes, etc.), it could overlap with general DevOps or deployment skills. The trigger terms are moderately distinctive. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.