polling-mechanism-setup
Polling Mechanism Setup - Auto-activating skill for API Integration. Triggers on: polling mechanism setup, polling mechanism setup Part of the API Integration skill category.
35
3%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
91%
1.03xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/16-api-integration/polling-mechanism-setup/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
7%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is essentially a title restated as a description with no substantive content. It lacks concrete actions, meaningful trigger terms, and explicit guidance on when Claude should select this skill. The repeated trigger term 'polling mechanism setup' suggests auto-generated content with no human refinement.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions such as 'Implements interval-based API polling, configures retry logic with exponential backoff, sets up long polling connections, and handles rate limiting for periodic endpoint checks.'
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms like 'Use when the user needs to periodically check an API endpoint, set up polling intervals, implement long polling, or create a mechanism to repeatedly query a service for updates.'
Differentiate from related skills by specifying what this covers vs. webhooks, event-driven architectures, or general API integration patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only names the concept 'Polling Mechanism Setup' without describing any concrete actions. There are no specific capabilities listed such as configuring intervals, handling retries, implementing exponential backoff, etc. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond restating the title, and the 'when' guidance is essentially just the skill name repeated. There is no explicit 'Use when...' clause with meaningful trigger scenarios. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms are just 'polling mechanism setup' repeated twice. It lacks natural variations users would say like 'poll an API', 'check endpoint periodically', 'interval-based requests', 'long polling', or 'webhook alternative'. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'polling mechanism' is a somewhat specific concept within API integration, the description is so vague that it could overlap with general API integration skills, webhook setup skills, or scheduling skills without clear boundaries. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a placeholder with no actual instructional content. It describes what it would do in abstract terms but provides zero actionable guidance on polling mechanisms—no code examples, no patterns (long polling, short polling, exponential backoff), no configuration, and no workflow steps. It fails on every dimension of the rubric.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable code examples for common polling patterns (e.g., simple interval polling, exponential backoff, long polling) with specific language implementations
Define a clear workflow for setting up a polling mechanism: choosing polling strategy, implementing the poll loop, handling errors/retries, and validating the mechanism works correctly
Remove all meta-description sections (Purpose, When to Use, Capabilities, Example Triggers) and replace with actual technical content—specific polling intervals, retry strategies, rate limit handling, and timeout configurations
Add concrete examples showing polling against a real API pattern, including request/response formats and how to detect completion or changes
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is entirely filler and meta-description. It explains what the skill does in abstract terms without providing any actual technical content. Phrases like 'Provides step-by-step guidance' and 'Follows industry best practices' are empty padding with zero informational value. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is no concrete guidance whatsoever—no code, no commands, no specific polling patterns, no configuration examples, no API examples. The entire skill describes rather than instructs, offering nothing executable or copy-paste ready. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow steps are defined. The skill claims to provide 'step-by-step guidance' but contains zero actual steps. There are no sequences, no validation checkpoints, and no error handling guidance for polling mechanisms. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a flat, monolithic block of meta-descriptions with no meaningful structure. There are no references to detailed materials, no links to examples or advanced topics, and the sections present (Purpose, When to Use, Capabilities) contain no substantive content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
b8a3b3e
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.