tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill providing-performance-optimization-adviceProvide comprehensive prioritized performance optimization recommendations for frontend, backend, and infrastructure. Use when analyzing bottlenecks or seeking improvement strategies. Trigger with phrases like "optimize performance", "improve speed", or "performance recommendations".
Validation
81%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
20%This skill content is overly verbose and lacks actionable guidance. It describes what the skill does conceptually but fails to provide concrete code examples, specific commands, or executable workflows. The repeated references to a 'plugin' are confusing and the content reads more like marketing copy than technical instructions.
Suggestions
Replace vague instructions with concrete, executable examples - show actual code for analyzing frontend performance (e.g., Lighthouse CLI commands, specific profiling tool usage)
Remove the 'How It Works' and 'When to Use' sections entirely - Claude doesn't need to be told when to use a skill or have the process explained abstractly
Add a concrete output template/schema showing exactly what the optimization report should look like with real example content
Include specific validation steps such as 'Run lighthouse --output=json to verify baseline metrics before and after changes'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The 'Overview', 'How It Works', 'When to Use', and 'Best Practices' sections are padded with unnecessary context that doesn't add actionable value. References to a non-existent 'plugin' add confusion. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, or executable guidance provided. The 'Instructions' section lists vague steps like 'Analyze frontend code' without specifying how. Examples describe what the skill 'will do' rather than showing actual implementation or output formats. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in the Instructions section but lack validation checkpoints or feedback loops. No concrete verification steps for the analysis process, and no clear criteria for when each step is complete or how to handle partial failures. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into sections but is monolithic with no references to external files. The 'Resources' section mentions guides but provides no actual links. Content that could be split (detailed examples, error handling) is all inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Activation
82%This description has strong completeness with explicit 'Use when' and 'Trigger with' clauses, and good trigger term coverage. However, it lacks specificity in describing concrete actions (what optimization techniques it actually provides) and its broad scope across all layers creates potential conflict risk with more specialized performance skills.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions like 'profile slow queries, analyze bundle sizes, identify memory leaks, recommend caching strategies' to improve specificity
Consider narrowing scope or adding distinguishing details to reduce overlap with potential domain-specific optimization skills (e.g., 'for full-stack applications' or 'cross-cutting concerns')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (performance optimization) and mentions areas (frontend, backend, infrastructure) but uses vague language like 'comprehensive prioritized recommendations' without listing concrete actions like 'profile database queries', 'optimize bundle size', or 'configure caching'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('provide comprehensive prioritized performance optimization recommendations for frontend, backend, and infrastructure') and when ('Use when analyzing bottlenecks or seeking improvement strategies. Trigger with phrases like...'). Has explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger phrases users would naturally say: 'optimize performance', 'improve speed', 'performance recommendations', plus 'bottlenecks' and 'improvement strategies'. Good coverage of natural language variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'performance optimization' is a clear domain, the broad scope (frontend, backend, infrastructure) could overlap with more specific skills like 'database optimization' or 'frontend bundle optimization'. The triggers are somewhat generic and could conflict with domain-specific performance skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.