Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured with real one-level-deep reference files and clear navigation. Its only weakness is minor verbosity from the sample output block and inline time-sensitive comments.
Suggestions
Trim the large sample output table and inline comments like "# 2025 timestamp" to reduce token cost without losing actionability.
Move the hardcoded "Updated: 2025-01-14" date out of the example or label it as illustrative to avoid time-sensitive clutter.
Consider consolidating the inline numeric-unit comments (e.g. "1000000000 = $1B cap") into a single threshold reference in implementation.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with executable commands and no concept explanations, but the embedded output block and inline time-sensitive markers ("Updated: 2025-01-14", "# 2025 timestamp") add tokens without earning their place; could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with specific flags (e.g. "--min-change 10 --volume-spike 3", "--category defi", "--format json --output movers.json") and a concrete output format sample. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A single-tool CLI skill with unambiguous numbered invocations and an error-handling table pointing to errors.md; per the simple-skills note, a single clear action scores 3 without requiring multi-step checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a Resources section signaling one-level-deep references (implementation.md, errors.md, examples.md) that exist as real files with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |