Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, well-disclosed skill body with a clear sequenced procedure and validation loops. It leans on contract references and abstract directives that reduce in-place actionability and add cross-reference density.
Suggestions
Inline one or two concrete examples of 'stated facts vs inferred bets vs guesses' output so the procedure is executable without opening references.
Consolidate the long References enumeration and duplicated contract-path mentions to reduce cross-reference overhead in the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the 12-step procedure and dense contract-style sections (Stage Arc Boundary, References list of 15+ paths) carry repetition and cross-referencing overhead that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in places (artifact paths, the validation command `check_bluf_structure.py ... --json`) but most steps are abstract directives ('Separate stated facts', 'Apply the first-principles contract') without executable detail, and many contracts are deferred to references. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 12-step procedure is clearly sequenced with an explicit Validation section, fail-fast checkpoints, and a validation script invocation with feedback loops for non-trivial artifacts. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (e.g. 'Read when detailed flow is needed: references/brainstorm-workflow-details.md'); referenced files like ideation-mode.md, requirements-artifact-guide.md, and discovery-interview.md all exist in references/. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |