Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a reasonable conceptual framework for Android modularization decisions but falls short on actionability — the core weakness. It reads more like a decision-making guide than an executable skill, lacking concrete build.gradle.kts configurations, dependency graph examples, or actual code showing how to implement the splits it describes. The workflow is logically sequenced but would benefit from validation checkpoints and concrete verification steps.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable code examples: show actual build.gradle.kts snippets demonstrating api vs implementation dependencies, a sample module graph configuration, and a before/after of a feature module split.
Include a validation step in the workflow, such as running `./gradlew buildHealth` or a custom script to verify no cyclic dependencies exist after restructuring.
Replace or supplement the fictional example project paths with inline code showing what the module structure and dependency declarations actually look like (e.g., a settings.gradle.kts include block and corresponding module build files).
Add a concrete example of detecting and fixing a cyclic dependency, showing the before state, the diagnostic command/output, and the after state.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient and doesn't over-explain basic concepts, but some sections like Guardrails and Anti-Patterns contain somewhat generic advice that Claude would already know (e.g., 'prefer official guidance over custom conventions', 'do not mix architectural cleanup with product behavior changes'). Could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides high-level workflow steps and principles but lacks concrete, executable guidance. There are no code examples showing actual module configurations (e.g., build.gradle.kts snippets for api vs implementation), no specific dependency declarations, and the 'examples' section references fictional project paths and scripts without showing actual outputs or configurations. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow has a clear 5-step sequence that logically progresses from mapping to splitting to handoff. However, it lacks validation checkpoints — there's no explicit step to verify the new module graph is acyclic, no feedback loop for when splits introduce new issues, and no concrete verification commands beyond the example Gradle commands. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and mentions handoff skills (android-gradle-build-logic, android-architecture-clean). However, the references to example directories and scripts appear to be fictional or at least unverified, and the official references are just a flat list without context about when to consult each one. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |