frontend-testing
Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.
Overall
score
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It specifies concrete actions with named technologies, provides comprehensive trigger terms that match natural developer language, explicitly states both what it does and when to use it, and carves out a distinct niche that won't conflict with generic testing skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests' for specific targets: 'Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities'. Names specific technologies and test types. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities') and when ('Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'testing', 'spec files', 'coverage', 'Vitest', 'RTL', 'unit tests', 'integration tests', 'write/review test requests'. These are terms developers naturally use when requesting test help. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche: specifically for Dify frontend, using Vitest + RTL stack. The combination of project name (Dify), testing framework (Vitest), and library (RTL) creates a unique, non-conflicting scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity. The incremental testing workflow with explicit validation checkpoints is particularly well-designed. The main weakness is some verbosity in explaining testing concepts Claude already knows (AAA pattern, black-box testing principles) and the 'When to Apply' section that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Remove or significantly condense the 'Core Principles' section - Claude already understands AAA pattern, black-box testing, and single-behavior-per-test concepts
Remove the 'When to Apply This Skill' section entirely - this is metadata that belongs in frontmatter triggers, not body content
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary sections like 'When to Apply This Skill' which Claude can infer, and the 'Core Principles' section explains concepts (AAA pattern, black-box testing) that Claude already knows well. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable code templates, specific commands (pnpm test, pnpm analyze-component), concrete file naming conventions, and copy-paste ready test structure. The examples are complete and runnable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent workflow with explicit incremental approach, clear validation checkpoints (Run test → PASS? → Next file, FAIL? → Fix first), complexity-based ordering, and visual flowchart. The 'NEVER generate all test files at once' warning with feedback loop is well-structured. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear overview sections and one-level-deep references to detailed guides (references/workflow.md, references/mocking.md, etc.). The Quick Reference table provides scannable information, and detailed content is appropriately linked rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 13 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.