CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

hwc-forms-validation

Handle Hotwire form workflows: form submission lifecycle, inline editing, validation errors, typeahead/autocomplete, modal forms, and external form controls. Prefer this skill when the core problem is correctness and UX of form interaction. Use hwc-navigation-content for pagination/tabs/filter navigation, hwc-realtime-streaming for WebSocket/Turbo Stream broadcasting, hwc-media-content for image/video/audio behavior, hwc-ux-feedback for generic loading/transition polish, and hwc-stimulus-fundamentals for framework-level Stimulus APIs not tied to forms.

71

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, concise skill that serves effectively as a routing/overview document for Hotwire form workflows. Its main weakness is the lack of any inline code examples—the SKILL.md body itself contains zero executable snippets, relying entirely on reference files for concrete implementation guidance. Adding even minimal code examples for the most common pattern (e.g., a Turbo Frame form with 422 rerender) would significantly improve actionability.

Suggestions

Add a minimal inline code example showing the most common pattern (e.g., a Turbo Frame wrapping a form with a controller returning 422/303) so the skill is actionable without opening reference files.

Add a validation checkpoint to the core workflow, e.g., after step 3: 'Verify the frame re-renders with error messages visible and focus is restored to the first invalid field.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what Turbo Frames or Stimulus are. The guardrails are terse but meaningful, and the reference/escalation sections are compact lists.

3 / 3

Actionability

The core workflow provides clear steps and the guardrails give specific technical guidance (return 422/303, use HTML form attribute, debounce keystrokes), but there are no concrete code examples—no HTML snippets, no Stimulus controller code, no ERB templates. The actionable detail is deferred entirely to reference files.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step core workflow is clearly sequenced and covers the form submission lifecycle well, but it lacks explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. For form operations that involve rerenders and state preservation (step 5), there's no verify/retry guidance—just an instruction to 'preserve user context' without showing how to confirm it works.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure: concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to specific files for each form pattern, plus clear escalation to neighbor skills. The instruction to 'open only the file needed' is a smart token-efficiency directive.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines its scope (Hotwire form workflows), lists specific concrete capabilities, provides explicit trigger guidance, and proactively disambiguates from five related skills. The boundary-drawing with other skills is particularly strong and would help Claude select the correct skill from a large pool. Uses proper third-person voice throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: form submission lifecycle, inline editing, validation errors, typeahead/autocomplete, modal forms, and external form controls. These are all distinct, concrete capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (Hotwire form workflows with specific capabilities listed) and 'when' ('Prefer this skill when the core problem is correctness and UX of form interaction'). Also explicitly delineates boundaries by naming other skills for adjacent concerns.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'form submission', 'inline editing', 'validation errors', 'typeahead', 'autocomplete', 'modal forms', 'form controls'. These are terms developers naturally use when describing form-related problems.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Exceptionally distinctive — not only defines its own niche (form interaction correctness and UX) but explicitly names five other skills and when to use them instead, dramatically reducing conflict risk with related Hotwire skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
lucianghinda/superpowers-ruby
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.