Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. Its only notable weakness is redundancy between the Process and Key Principles sections, which slightly hurts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the "Key Principles" section since its bullets duplicate guidance already covered in "The Process", recovering token budget without losing information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept-explaining fluff, but the "Key Principles" section largely recapitulates guidance already stated in "The Process" (one question at a time, multiple choice, explore alternatives, incremental validation), so it could be tightened and does not reach the every-token-earns-its-place level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific, copy-applicable guidance — "Ask questions one at a time", "Propose 2-3 different approaches", "200-300 words" sections, the file path docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md, and named tools/skills — which for an instruction-only skill meets the concrete-guidance bar. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced process (understand → document → explore approaches → present → after design) with explicit validation checkpoints ("checking after each section whether it looks right") and feedback loops ("Be ready to go back and clarify"), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is a self-contained, well-organized overview split into clear sections with only single-level references to other skills (no 2+ level nested reference chains), meeting the well-organized-sections bar for a skill without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |