ceo-advisor

Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management. Includes strategy analyzer, financial scenario modeling, board governance frameworks, and investor relations playbooks. Use when planning strategy, preparing board presentations, managing investors, developing organizational culture, making executive decisions, or when user mentions CEO, strategic planning, board meetings, investor updates, organizational leadership, or executive strategy.

1.68x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

86%

1.68x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized but oversized reference that leans on generic CEO knowledge Claude already has, with broken references to non-existent bundle files and no validation checkpoints in its workflows. It is competent but inefficient and not fully functional as structured.

Suggestions

Cut generic content Claude already knows (hourly daily schedule, day-by-day weekly rhythm, book/network lists, work-life and energy-management tips) and retain only the non-obvious structured artifacts to improve conciseness.

Resolve the broken references: either create references/*.md and scripts/*.py and move the inline detail into them, or remove the dangling references so progressive disclosure is functional.

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the multi-step processes (e.g., board-prep timeline, Go/No-Go decision framework) so workflows include feedback loops rather than only informational sequences.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~500-line body is organized and contains some non-obvious structured artifacts (capital allocation percentages, stakeholder matrix, board package page counts), but is padded with generic CEO content Claude already knows—hourly daily schedule, day-by-day weekly rhythm, book lists, work-life/energy tips—so it is not the lean 3 and not fully the rambling-prose 1.	2 / 3
Actionability	Concrete frameworks and checklists are present, but the two executable commands ("python scripts/strategy_analyzer.py", "python scripts/financial_scenario_analyzer.py") reference scripts that do not exist, and much content describes ("Define 10-year aspirational future") rather than instructs, falling short of copy-paste-ready at 3.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Sequences are clearly laid out (Q1–Q4 planning cycle, T-4 to T-0 board prep, crisis levels, succession timeline) and a decision checklist exists, but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints or feedback loops, matching the sequence-present-but-checkpoints-missing anchor.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well sectioned and signals one-level references ("From references/leadership_organizational_culture.md", "Use framework from references/executive_decision_framework.md"), but those referenced files and scripts do not exist and the bulk of detail remains inline, so the disclosure is incomplete rather than clearly split at 3.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

92%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states capabilities and provides explicit, natural trigger terms covering both what and when. Its only weakness is moderate conflict risk from several broad leadership triggers that could overlap with sibling executive skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete capabilities—"strategy analyzer, financial scenario modeling, board governance frameworks, and investor relations playbooks"—matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor rather than the single-domain anchor at 2.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly states what ("Executive leadership guidance... Includes strategy analyzer, financial scenario modeling...") and when ("Use when planning strategy... or when user mentions CEO, strategic planning, board meetings..."), satisfying the both-what-and-when anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms a user would say are well covered—"CEO, strategic planning, board meetings, investor updates, organizational leadership, or executive strategy"—matching the good-coverage anchor; it is not mere jargon (1) nor missing common variations (2).	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CEO/board/investor core is a distinct niche, but broad triggers like "strategic planning," "making executive decisions," and "organizational leadership" overlap with likely sibling C-level/leadership skills, so it does not reach the unlikely-to-conflict anchor at 3.	2 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (518 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 9 missing	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Commit: cb3ef45

Reviewed: about 18 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.