Agent coordination, orchestration, and multi-agent workflow management scripts
76
Quality
47%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.42xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/agent-coordination/wolf-scripts-agents-majiayu000-claude-skill-regist/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description identifies a specific domain (multi-agent systems) but remains too abstract and lacks actionable detail. It fails to provide explicit trigger conditions for when Claude should select this skill, and the capabilities listed are high-level categories rather than concrete actions. The description would benefit significantly from specific examples and a 'Use when...' clause.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers like 'Use when the user needs to coordinate multiple agents, spawn parallel workers, or manage distributed task execution'
Replace abstract terms with concrete actions: instead of 'orchestration', specify 'spawn sub-agents, route tasks between agents, aggregate results from parallel workers'
Include natural trigger terms users would say: 'parallel agents', 'spawn workers', 'agent-to-agent communication', 'task distribution'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (agent coordination, orchestration, multi-agent workflows) and implies actions (management scripts), but doesn't list concrete specific actions like 'spawn agents', 'route tasks', or 'monitor agent status'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Only addresses 'what' at a high level (agent coordination scripts) but completely lacks any 'when' guidance or 'Use when...' clause. Per rubric guidelines, missing explicit trigger guidance caps this at 2, but the 'what' is also weak, warranting a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'agent coordination', 'orchestration', 'multi-agent', and 'workflow' that users might say, but missing common variations like 'spawn agents', 'parallel tasks', 'agent communication', or 'distributed work'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The multi-agent focus provides some distinction, but 'workflow management scripts' is generic enough to potentially overlap with general automation or scripting skills. Could conflict with task management or general orchestration tools. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides highly actionable, executable guidance for agent coordination with excellent workflow clarity and validation checkpoints. However, it is severely over-engineered for a SKILL.md file - the content is extremely verbose and would benefit from aggressive condensation, moving detailed code examples to separate reference files while keeping the SKILL.md as a concise overview with pointers.
Suggestions
Reduce content by 60-70% by moving detailed code examples (class definitions, full API examples) to separate reference files like AGENT-EXECUTOR-REFERENCE.md, WORKFLOW-ORCHESTRATOR-REFERENCE.md
Condense the good/bad examples section to 1-2 brief examples instead of extensive multi-page comparisons
Remove explanatory text that describes what classes/methods do - Claude understands code structure; just show the code
Convert the 'Best Practices' section to a compact checklist format instead of verbose do/don't lists
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose at ~700+ lines with extensive code examples that could be condensed. Includes unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude understands (class structures, JSON formats, file system patterns). The good/bad examples section alone is ~150 lines and could be drastically shortened. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable code examples with complete JavaScript/bash snippets, specific file paths, concrete configuration objects, and copy-paste ready command line usage. The code examples are complete and executable, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints. The workflow orchestrator pattern shows numbered phases with status indicators, the validation examples show pass/fail states, and there are clear feedback loops (validate → fix → retry) throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Has some structure with clear sections and references to related skills at the end, but the main content is monolithic with extensive inline code that could be split into separate reference files. The 'Related Skills' section provides good navigation, but the body contains too much detail that should be in separate files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (943 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
6213d1a
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.