pinia

Pinia state management for JARVIS system state

Quality

49%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pinia/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with excellent actionability - the code examples are complete, typed, and executable. The TDD workflow and checklists provide clear validation steps. However, the document is verbose for a skill file, with some redundancy and content that could be moved to reference files to improve token efficiency.

Suggestions

Move the detailed performance patterns (Section 5.5) and anti-patterns (Section 8) to a separate reference file, keeping only a brief summary with links in the main skill

Remove redundant code examples - the health status calculation appears in both Section 3.3 and Section 4.1

Consolidate the version table and Nuxt configuration into a 'Setup' reference file, keeping only the essential store patterns in the main skill

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill contains some unnecessary verbosity, particularly in section headers and explanatory text. While the code examples are valuable, there's redundancy between sections (e.g., health status calculation appears multiple times, performance patterns are referenced in multiple places).	2 / 3
Actionability	Excellent executable code examples throughout - fully typed TypeScript, copy-paste ready store implementations, complete test examples with vitest setup, and specific npm commands for verification. The TDD workflow provides concrete, step-by-step guidance.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Clear TDD workflow with explicit steps (write failing test → implement → refactor → verify). The pre-implementation checklist provides validation checkpoints across three phases. Section 3.3 explicitly shows the verification commands to run.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	References to 'references/' folder for advanced patterns are mentioned but the main document is quite long (~400 lines) with content that could be split out. The version table, anti-patterns, and detailed performance patterns could live in separate reference files to keep the main skill leaner.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

22%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is too terse and lacks actionable detail. It identifies the technology (Pinia) and general purpose (state management) but fails to specify concrete capabilities or provide explicit trigger conditions for when Claude should use this skill. The JARVIS-specific context helps with distinctiveness but doesn't compensate for the missing 'Use when...' guidance.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying triggers like 'when working with JARVIS Vue components', 'managing application state', or 'creating/modifying Pinia stores'.

List specific concrete actions such as 'create Pinia stores, define getters and actions, manage reactive state across components'.

Include natural keyword variations users might say: 'Vue store', 'global state', 'reactive data', 'store module'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description only names a technology (Pinia) and a vague domain (state management) without listing any concrete actions like 'create stores', 'manage reactive state', or 'handle getters/actions'.	1 / 3
Completeness	The description weakly addresses 'what' (state management) but completely lacks any 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'Pinia' and 'state management' are relevant technical keywords, but missing common variations users might say like 'Vue store', 'reactive state', 'Vuex alternative', or 'global state'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Pinia' and 'JARVIS system' provide some specificity, but 'state management' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other state management skills (Redux, Vuex, Zustand).	2 / 3
	Total	6 / 12 Passed

Validation

68%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (501 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
description_trigger_hint	Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...')	Warning
metadata_version	'metadata' field is not a dictionary	Warning
license_field	'license' field is missing	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	11 / 16 Passed

Repository: martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator
Commit: 1086ef2

Reviewed: 5 months ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.