Generated
Validation
Total
11/16Score
Passed| Criteria | Score |
|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (501 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking |
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary |
license_field | 'license' field is missing |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata |
Implementation
Suggestions 2
Score
85%Overall Assessment
This is a strong, well-organized skill with excellent actionability through executable code examples and clear TDD workflow. The progressive disclosure is well-implemented with appropriate references to detailed materials. Minor verbosity in meta-sections (validation gates, file organization explanation) slightly reduces token efficiency without adding operational value.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | 2/3 | The skill is generally efficient but includes some unnecessary elements like the validation gates table and meta-information about file organization that don't directly help Claude execute tasks. Some sections could be tightened (e.g., the overview explaining what Python backend services handle). |
Actionability | 3/3 | Excellent executable code examples throughout - Pydantic validators, Argon2 password hashing, SQLAlchemy queries, subprocess handling, and pytest tests are all copy-paste ready. The TDD workflow provides concrete step-by-step implementation guidance with real code. |
Workflow Clarity | 3/3 | Clear multi-step TDD workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 4 verification commands). The pre-deployment checklist provides explicit phases with validation gates. Security testing commands are clearly sequenced with pass/fail criteria. |
Progressive Disclosure | 3/3 | Well-structured with clear overview sections and explicit one-level-deep references to detailed materials (references/security-examples.md, references/advanced-patterns.md, references/threat-model.md). Navigation is clearly signaled with '> See X for Y' patterns. |
Activation
Suggestions 3
Score
22%Overall Assessment
This description is too vague and lacks actionable specificity. It fails to list concrete capabilities (what specific backend tasks it handles) and completely omits trigger guidance for when Claude should use this skill. The mention of quality attributes (security, performance, maintainability) is aspirational rather than descriptive of actual functionality.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | 1/3 | The description uses vague language like 'emphasizing security, performance, and maintainability' without listing any concrete actions. It doesn't specify what operations can be performed (e.g., create APIs, handle authentication, manage databases). |
Completeness | 1/3 | The 'what' is vaguely stated as 'backend services development' without specifics, and there is no 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. |
Trigger Term Quality | 2/3 | Contains some relevant keywords ('Backend', 'Python', 'services') but misses common variations users might say like 'API', 'server', 'REST', 'endpoints', 'database', or specific framework names. |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 2/3 | The mention of 'JARVIS AI Assistant' provides some project-specific context, but 'backend services development with Python' is broad enough to potentially conflict with other Python or web development skills. |
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.