Laravel framework skill for writing, reviewing, and testing PHP applications built with Laravel. Use whenever working on Laravel-specific patterns: controllers, FormRequests, Eloquent models, service/action classes, Blade templates, jobs, events, policies, observers, or Artisan commands. Also applies to Inertia frontends (React or Vue) embedded inside a Laravel project — covering useForm, usePage, Link navigation, partial reloads, page component naming (PostsIndexPage), and shadcn wrapper conventions. Trigger any time someone mentions Laravel, Eloquent, Artisan, Blade, FormRequest, Inertia within Laravel, N+1 queries in a Laravel app, inline controller validation, where business logic should live in a Laravel controller, or asks to follow best practices in a Laravel codebase. Does not apply to plain PHP scripts without Laravel, Rails, Django, standalone Next.js, or non-Laravel frameworks.
86
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an exemplary skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides comprehensive coverage of Laravel-specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms developers would use, explicitly states both what it does and when to use it, and clearly distinguishes itself from other framework skills through explicit exclusions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and patterns: 'controllers, FormRequests, Eloquent models, service/action classes, Blade templates, jobs, events, policies, observers, Artisan commands' plus detailed Inertia coverage including 'useForm, usePage, Link navigation, partial reloads, page component naming'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('writing, reviewing, and testing PHP applications built with Laravel' with extensive pattern list) AND when ('Use whenever working on Laravel-specific patterns', 'Trigger any time someone mentions...'). Also includes explicit exclusions for clarity. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'Laravel, Eloquent, Artisan, Blade, FormRequest, Inertia, N+1 queries, inline controller validation, business logic, best practices in a Laravel codebase'. These are terms developers naturally use when seeking Laravel help. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche (Laravel framework specifically) and explicit exclusions ('Does not apply to plain PHP scripts without Laravel, Rails, Django, standalone Next.js, or non-Laravel frameworks') that prevent conflicts with other web framework skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with clear workflows and good progressive disclosure through external references. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity in the principles sections and lack of concrete code examples - the skill describes what to do but doesn't show executable Laravel/Inertia code snippets that Claude could directly use as templates.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete code examples showing a thin controller + FormRequest + Service pattern to make the actionability more tangible
Include a complete JSON output example for the Review workflow rather than just describing the structure
Consolidate the Inertia React and Vue sections - they share significant overlap in directory structure and conventions that could be unified
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundant explanations (e.g., restating principles that Laravel developers would know). The Inertia sections repeat structural information that could be consolidated, and some bullet points explain concepts Claude already understands. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides structured workflows and references to external files (rulebook.json, inertia-react.md), but lacks concrete executable code examples. The JSON output format is described but not shown with a complete example. Instructions are procedural but abstract rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three workflows (Review, Generate code, Generate tests) are clearly sequenced with numbered steps. The review workflow includes explicit output requirements (rule_id, evidence, patch outline, test plan). Each workflow has a logical progression from analysis to output. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent use of external references: rulebook.json as source of truth, separate markdown files for Inertia React/Vue details. The main skill provides high-level principles while pointing to one-level-deep references for detailed information. Navigation is clear with explicit file paths. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
22c7c54
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.