CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

running-in-ci

CI environment rules for GitHub Actions workflows. Use when operating in CI — covers security, CI monitoring, comment formatting, and investigating session logs from other runs.

85

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description effectively communicates when to use the skill (CI environments) and provides a reasonable overview of its scope. However, the capabilities listed are somewhat categorical rather than concrete actions, and the trigger terms could include more natural variations that users might say when needing CI help.

Suggestions

Replace category names with specific concrete actions (e.g., 'parse workflow logs', 'format PR review comments', 'diagnose failed builds' instead of 'CI monitoring, comment formatting')

Add common trigger term variations like 'pipeline', 'build failures', 'workflow runs', 'CI/CD', or 'actions workflow'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (GitHub Actions, CI) and lists some actions (security, CI monitoring, comment formatting, investigating session logs), but these are categories rather than concrete specific actions like 'parse workflow logs' or 'format PR comments'.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('CI environment rules for GitHub Actions workflows... covers security, CI monitoring, comment formatting, and investigating session logs') and when ('Use when operating in CI') with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'CI', 'GitHub Actions', 'workflows', and 'session logs', but misses common variations users might say like 'pipeline', 'build', 'actions', 'workflow runs', or 'CI/CD'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche focused specifically on CI environments and GitHub Actions workflows, with distinct triggers like 'operating in CI' and 'session logs from other runs' that are unlikely to conflict with general coding or documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a high-quality skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity. The content is concise, assumes Claude's competence, and provides fully executable commands with clear validation checkpoints. The main weakness is the monolithic structure — the document is comprehensive but could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files for better progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Consider splitting 'Investigating Other CI Runs' and 'CI Monitoring' into separate reference files (e.g., CI_MONITORING.md, SESSION_LOGS.md) with brief summaries in the main skill

Add a quick-reference section at the top with the most common commands (gh pr view, gh pr checks) before diving into detailed workflows

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient throughout. It assumes Claude's competence with git, GitHub CLI, and shell scripting without explaining basic concepts. Every section provides actionable information without padding.

3 / 3

Actionability

Excellent executable examples throughout — complete bash commands, gh CLI invocations, jq filters, and API calls are all copy-paste ready. The polling loops, API endpoints, and file-based argument patterns are fully specified.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints. The CI monitoring section has numbered steps with feedback loops (poll → diagnose → fix → repeat). The 'only when valid' pattern and explicit error recovery paths are well-defined.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-organized with clear section headers, but it's a long monolithic document (~200 lines) that could benefit from splitting detailed sections (e.g., CI Monitoring, Investigating Other CI Runs) into separate reference files. No external file references are provided.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
max-sixty/worktrunk
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.