Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear, validated workflows tailored to the project, though it carries some generic programming advice and keeps all content inline with no progressive disclosure structure.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Leverage Existing Code' and 'Avoid Magic Numbers' sections to project-specific reminders and drop the general-principle prose Claude already knows.
Consider moving the long worked Go examples into a reference file under references/ and linking to it from the body to enable one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Condense the WWW-Authenticate worked example to a brief illustration rather than a full before/after code block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and project-specific, but the 'Leverage Existing Code' and 'Avoid Magic Numbers' sections restate general programming principles Claude already knows (e.g. 'someone has already written it', 'Hand-rolled code drifts') and the worked Go examples are somewhat padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The body is rich in copy-paste-ready commands (`make manifests`, `make lint-fix`, `chainsaw test --selector '!llm'`) plus concrete directory tables and executable Go adapter examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step flows are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints — the lint-fix → lint → build → test chain and the final Completion Checklist provide clear feedback loops for error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-sectioned but monolithic at ~190 lines with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent) and no offloaded sub-references, so nothing is split for progressive discovery. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |