Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is largely a generic Membrane CLI integration template with AddressFinder Australia branding. It lacks AddressFinder-specific actionable examples (actual search queries, geocoding examples with parameters), and the 'Popular actions' section is empty. The content is verbose with boilerplate explanations that don't add value for Claude.
Suggestions
Add concrete, AddressFinder-specific examples under 'Popular actions' showing actual address search, forward geocode, and reverse geocode commands with real parameters and expected output shapes.
Remove the introductory paragraph explaining what AddressFinder Australia is — Claude already knows this and it wastes tokens.
Trim the generic Membrane CLI boilerplate (installation, auth flow, proxy flags table) to the minimum needed, or move it to a shared reference file.
Add a validation step after connection setup, such as running a test address search to confirm the connection works before proceeding with the user's actual task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is verbose with unnecessary explanations Claude already knows (e.g., 'AddressFinder Australia is a SaaS app that provides address autocomplete and verification services...'). The overview of what AddressFinder does, the explanation of what Membrane handles, and the detailed proxy request flag table all add significant token overhead. Much of this is generic Membrane CLI boilerplate not specific to AddressFinder Australia. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete CLI commands for authentication, connection setup, action discovery, and running actions, which is good. However, there are no AddressFinder-specific executable examples (e.g., an actual address search command with real parameters), and the 'Popular actions' section is empty — it just tells you to discover actions rather than listing them with concrete usage examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection setup workflow has a reasonable sequence with state handling (READY, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, etc.), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery feedback loops. The overall workflow from install → auth → connect → search actions → run actions is present but lacks verification steps (e.g., confirming the CLI installed correctly, verifying the connection works with a test query). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is structured with headers and sections, but it's essentially a monolithic document with no references to supporting files. The proxy request flags table and detailed connection state handling could be split into separate reference documents. There are no bundle files to reference, but the content length and mixed detail levels suggest it would benefit from better layering. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |