Content
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill suffers severely from an enormous, repetitive action catalog that dominates the content without adding value—Claude can discover actions via the CLI. The Membrane CLI integration instructions are reasonably actionable but lack AFAS-specific examples. The content would benefit dramatically from removing the action list, adding concrete AFAS workflow examples, and splitting reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically reduce the action catalog (the 100+ List/Get bullet points) since `membrane action list --intent=QUERY` already provides discovery—replace with 2-3 concrete examples showing real AFAS workflows (e.g., retrieving an invoice, creating a connector filter).
Add concrete, end-to-end examples with actual AFAS-specific parameters and expected output shapes, such as listing invoices with filters or executing a workflow.
Extract any reference material (action categories, API endpoint patterns) into a separate REFERENCE.md file and link to it from the main skill.
Add validation/error handling guidance for action runs—what to do when an action fails, how to interpret error responses, and retry strategies.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is extremely verbose with a massive list of 100+ actions that are all repetitive variations of 'List X / Get X — Use this to list/retrieve details of a specific X.' This is pure padding that Claude can infer from a single pattern. The overview section alone is ~120 lines of near-identical bullet points. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The CLI commands for authentication, connection setup, action discovery, and running actions are concrete and executable. However, there are no AFAS-specific examples (e.g., how to actually retrieve an invoice or create a connector filter with real parameters), and the massive action list provides no actionable detail beyond names. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection setup workflow has a reasonable sequence with state handling (READY, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, etc.) and polling instructions. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints for the broader workflow of discovering and running actions, and no error recovery guidance for failed action runs. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The entire content is a monolithic wall of text with no references to external files. The massive action catalog should be in a separate reference file or omitted entirely since `membrane action list` already provides discovery. No bundle files exist to offload this content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |