Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The Membrane CLI operational sections are executable and reasonably well-designed (connection state handling even includes a feedback loop), but the body is dominated by a massively repetitive action catalog that wastes tokens and should live in a reference file or be removed. Dangling internal references ('Step 2') further weaken workflow coherence.
Suggestions
Move the ~140-line subject/action catalog into a references/ file (e.g. actions.md) referenced with a single link, or delete it entirely and rely on `membrane action list --intent` discovery, stating the List/Get/Search/Execute naming pattern in one sentence.
Fix the dangling 'skip to **Step 2**' reference by labeling the actual step sections (1. Connect, 2. Discover actions, 3. Run actions) and removing the orphaned '1b' subsection numbering.
Add a brief validation step after running actions, e.g. check the `output` field for errors and retry with corrected --input parameters before reporting results to the user.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 140 of ~280 lines are near-identical bullets ('List X — Use this to list all available X', 'Get X — Use this to retrieve details of a specific X') that repeat three templates and duplicate what `membrane action list --intent` already provides. The CLI setup, connection, and proxy sections are tight, so this is noticeably padded rather than severely verbose throughout. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable throughout (npm install, membrane login, connection ensure with --json, action run with --input, and a proxy flags table). Minor gaps keep it from 5: 'skip to **Step 2**' points to a step that is never labeled, and 'Use action names and parameters as needed' is vague. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A real sequence exists (install → login → connection ensure → poll state → search actions → run) with genuine checkpoints for connection states (READY, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, CONFIGURATION_ERROR with re-polling instructions). However, coherence breaks on the undefined 'Step 2' reference and a '1b' subsection with no numbered step flow, leaving gaps that anchor 3 (sequence present but checkpoints/coherence incomplete) fits better than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files at all, and the ~140-line action/subject inventory is content that clearly belongs in a separate reference file (or could be dropped, since the CLI discovers actions dynamically), inlined directly in the main file. Headers provide some structure, but the inlining and absence of any clearly signaled external references match anchor 2 more than 3. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |