Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with an explicit, checkpointed loop and good file separation, but the decorative ASCII help box wastes tokens and duplicates the Main Loop. Actionability and workflow clarity are solid; conciseness is the main drag.
Suggestions
Replace the space-padded ASCII box with a compact markdown list; fold the non-duplicated parts of "WHAT IT DOES" into the Main Loop to remove redundancy.
Tighten the TEST step from "suggest fixes" to an explicit apply-and-re-test gate to strengthen the validation checkpoint.
Inline a one-line example of a scaffolded routing test prompt so the SCAFFOLD step is executable without requiring the vally-eval skill lookup.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The large ASCII art box uses extensive space padding and its "WHAT IT DOES" section duplicates the Main Loop, making it noticeably padded rather than merely efficient. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths like `plugins/{plugin}/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md` and `evals/{skill-name}/*.yaml` plus an explicit CONVENTIONS.md reference give mostly executable guidance, with minor gaps from deferring to vally-eval. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps include VERIFY and TEST checkpoints plus a REPEAT feedback loop with an iteration cap, though "suggest fixes" is softer than a hard validation gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with detailed conventions split into the real, one-level-deep references/CONVENTIONS.md and vally-eval clearly signaled, giving easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |