Content
7%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads as a generic checklist of Drupal development best practices that Claude already knows, offering no concrete code examples, specific commands, or novel project-specific guidance. It lacks actionable instructions, executable examples, and any workflow sequencing. The content would need a fundamental rewrite to provide value beyond what Claude's training data already covers.
Suggestions
Replace vague directives with concrete, executable code examples — e.g., show a complete minimal module with .info.yml, .services.yml, a controller, and a route definition.
Add a step-by-step workflow for common tasks like 'creating a new custom module' with validation checkpoints (e.g., drush cr, phpunit commands to verify).
Remove generic advice Claude already knows (SOLID, DRY, PSR-12, 'sanitize all user input') and focus on Drupal-specific patterns, gotchas, or project-specific conventions that are genuinely novel.
Include concrete file structure examples and templates showing exact file paths, naming conventions, and boilerplate code for services.yml, routing.yml, and hook implementations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is largely a list of general best practices and principles that Claude already knows well (SOLID, DRY, PSR-12, dependency injection, sanitize input, etc.). Very little here is novel or specific enough to justify the token cost. It reads like a generic Drupal development guide rather than targeted instructions. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no concrete code examples, no executable commands, no specific file templates, and no copy-paste ready snippets. Every item is a vague directive like 'Use Drupal's database API' or 'Implement proper access checks' without showing how. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequenced workflow, no step-by-step process for creating a module, no validation checkpoints, and no feedback loops. The content is organized as flat bullet-point lists of principles without any procedural guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content has some structural organization with headers and subsections (Services, Routing, Forms, etc.), which aids navigation. However, there are no references to external files, no links to deeper documentation, and all content is inline at the same level of abstraction. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |