Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, action-oriented hook reference with strong sequencing and explicit gating for the delegation flow. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it repeatedly points to HOOKS-REFERENCE.md for the details that justify the lean main file, but that file is absent.
Suggestions
Add the missing HOOKS-REFERENCE.md bundle file containing the extended startup checks, approval polling, skill-matrix verification, and per-check example commands the body advertises, or inline that detail and drop the dangling links.
Make the deferred verification commands (fast-review invocation, the codebase-tool lint/typecheck/test commands, AC-verification steps) concrete in the body rather than pointing to the absent reference.
Add an explicit re-validate/re-delegate feedback loop note under on-post-delegate (the 3rd-failure path is named but the retry→re-review cycle is only implied).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table-driven with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place (lifecycle diagram, numbered action tables, two anti-patterns). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, copy-pasteable commands ('rg -n "keyword" .opencastle/LESSONS-LEARNED.md', 'gh issue view TAS-XX', 'comm -12 <(sort agent1-files) <(sort agent2-files)', 'opencastle log --type=...'), but a few entries are pointers ('Run fast-review skill', 'Lint, typecheck, and test ... via the codebase-tool slot') rather than executable steps, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each hook is a numbered sequence with a lifecycle diagram, and on-pre-delegate has an explicit hard gate ('All 6 must pass before the sub-agent is dispatched') plus on-session-end's HARD GATE; validation is largely present (CI checks, AC verification, '3rd failure → AGENT-FAILURES.md'), though some checkpoints are implicit and detailed commands are deferred to a missing reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and a one-level-deep reference (HOOKS-REFERENCE.md) is clearly signaled four times, but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle — so the advertised navigation leads nowhere and the teased extended content (approval polling, per-check example commands) is unreachable, undercutting the disclosure structure. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |