Maps file dependencies, flags shared imports, and groups files for safe parallel editing before code changes. Use when planning a refactoring, analyzing change impact, or understanding which files a modification will affect.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong, well-crafted description that clearly communicates specific capabilities (dependency mapping, import flagging, parallel edit grouping) and provides explicit trigger conditions. It uses proper third-person voice, includes natural developer terminology, and carves out a distinct niche that separates it from general refactoring or code analysis skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Maps file dependencies', 'flags shared imports', 'groups files for safe parallel editing'. These are clear, distinct capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Maps file dependencies, flags shared imports, groups files for safe parallel editing') and when ('Use when planning a refactoring, analyzing change impact, or understanding which files a modification will affect') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural terms users would say: 'refactoring', 'change impact', 'dependencies', 'imports', 'parallel editing', 'modification will affect'. These cover common ways developers describe dependency analysis needs. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Occupies a clear niche around pre-change dependency analysis and parallel editing safety. The combination of dependency mapping, shared import flagging, and safe parallel grouping is distinctive and unlikely to conflict with general code editing or refactoring execution skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly structured. It provides concrete tool invocations with realistic patterns, a clear 4-step workflow with validation, and appropriate progressive disclosure to a reference file. The when-to-use/skip table and anti-patterns section add practical guardrails without bloat.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section earns its place — the when-to-use table is compact, steps are terse, and anti-patterns are bullet points. No unnecessary explanations of what grep or imports are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable tool calls (grep_search with actual patterns, vscode_listCodeUsages with example arguments) and a complete output template. The examples use realistic file paths and are copy-paste adaptable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step sequence is clearly ordered (entry points → trace outward → trace inward → build map) with a validation checkpoint that specifies both tool-based verification and CI command (`pnpm typecheck`). Anti-patterns section adds guardrails. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a concise overview with an inline minimal example, then references REFERENCE.md for the full template and integration snippets — exactly one level deep, clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
18c6f2c
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.