Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill that is lean, actionable, and uses one-level-deep references effectively with an explicit finishing validation step. Inlining a small executable example and adding an error-recovery loop would push it to full marks.
Suggestions
Inline one small copy-paste-ready code snippet (e.g., a minimal requireUserSession(event) guard) so the body is fully executable without opening a reference.
Add a brief validate-on-failure feedback loop near the finishing checkpoint (e.g., 'if the typecheck or auth test fails, fix and re-run before finishing').
Consider surfacing one or two natural-sounding synonyms (auth, login) in the description to broaden trigger-term coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding — it assumes Claude's competence, explains no Nuxt/Better Auth fundamentals, and every line carries actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete named APIs (requireUserSession(event), refreshSessionCookieCache(event), runWithSessionRefresh()) and a precise task-to-file routing table, but the actual executable code is delegated to reference files rather than inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear routing and cross-task rules with an explicit finishing validation checkpoint (run the consumer's typecheck and the narrowest relevant auth test), but lacks an error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clean overview routes each task to a one-level-deep reference, all eight referenced files exist in references/, and navigation is consistently signaled and easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |