CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

yeet

Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).

88

1.10x
Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.10x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity, providing concrete commands and clear sequencing with validation checkpoints throughout. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity—some sections (PR title conventions, PR body guidelines) could be more concise or split into reference files. The skill effectively handles edge cases like existing PRs, template discovery, and push failures.

Suggestions

Trim the PR title conventional commit examples section—Claude already knows this convention; a single example line and the type list would suffice.

Consider extracting the detailed PR Body Contents guidelines into a separate reference file to improve progressive disclosure and reduce the main skill's length.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly detailed and well-structured, but includes some verbose sections that could be tightened. The PR title format section with conventional commit examples is somewhat redundant for Claude, and the PR Body Contents section repeats guidance (e.g., explaining what 'why' and 'what' mean) that could be more concise. However, most content is domain-specific and not trivially known.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides fully executable shell commands throughout (git commands, gh CLI commands), specific flag usage, environment variable settings (GH_PROMPT_DISABLED, GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT), and concrete template discovery paths. The workflow steps are copy-paste ready with real commands.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is clearly sequenced from prerequisites through branch creation, staging, committing, pushing, template discovery, PR creation/update, and body editing. It includes explicit validation checkpoints (check gh auth status, check if PR exists, handle push failures, handle missing deps), feedback loops (install deps and rerun checks, pull from master and retry push), and clear conditional branching.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-organized with clear section headers, but it's a fairly long monolithic document with no references to external files. The PR body guidelines and PR title conventions could potentially be split into separate reference files. However, given no bundle files exist, the inline approach is acceptable though not optimal for a skill of this length.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description excels at completeness and distinctiveness by clearly specifying both when to use the skill and what it does, with a narrow and well-defined scope. Its main weakness is that it only describes a single flow rather than listing multiple concrete actions or sub-capabilities, which limits its specificity score. The trigger terms are strong and naturally match what users would say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names specific actions (stage, commit, push, open a GitHub pull request) and mentions the tool (GitHub CLI / `gh`), but it doesn't elaborate on what each step entails or list additional capabilities beyond the single flow.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request using `gh`) and 'when' ('Use only when the user explicitly asks to...'). The explicit 'Use when' clause is present and well-defined.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms: 'stage', 'commit', 'push', 'pull request', 'GitHub', 'gh', and 'GitHub CLI' — these are terms users would naturally use when requesting this workflow.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — it targets a very specific combined workflow (stage + commit + push + PR via GitHub CLI) and uses the qualifier 'only when the user explicitly asks', making it unlikely to conflict with general git or GitHub skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openai/skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.