Frames coding-agent work sessions with explicit intent capture and drift monitoring. Use when a session transitions from planning/Q&A to implementation for coding tasks, refactors, feature builds, bug fixes, or other multi-step execution where scope drift is a risk.
86
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description with a clear 'Use when' clause that provides explicit trigger conditions. Its main weakness is that the 'what' portion uses somewhat abstract process language ('frames', 'intent capture', 'drift monitoring') rather than listing concrete actions. The trigger terms and completeness are strong, making it effective for skill selection.
Suggestions
Make the capabilities more concrete by specifying actions, e.g., 'Creates a session plan with stated goals, tracks scope against initial intent, and flags deviations during multi-step coding work.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (coding-agent work sessions) and some actions (intent capture, drift monitoring), but the actions are somewhat abstract rather than concrete. 'Frames' and 'explicit intent capture' are process-oriented rather than describing specific concrete operations like 'creates a session plan' or 'logs scope boundaries'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Frames coding-agent work sessions with explicit intent capture and drift monitoring') and when ('Use when a session transitions from planning/Q&A to implementation for coding tasks, refactors, feature builds, bug fixes, or other multi-step execution where scope drift is a risk'). The 'Use when' clause is explicit and detailed. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Good coverage of natural terms users would encounter: 'coding tasks', 'refactors', 'feature builds', 'bug fixes', 'multi-step execution', 'scope drift', 'planning', 'implementation'. These are terms a user or Claude would naturally associate with needing session framing. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | This occupies a clear niche — session framing and drift monitoring for coding agents — that is unlikely to conflict with typical coding, debugging, or planning skills. The focus on session transitions and scope drift management is distinctive. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted process skill with highly actionable structured templates and a clear three-phase workflow. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity in the interoperability section, which explains complementary skill relationships at length that could be more concise or externalized. The core workflow is excellent — concrete, sequenced, and includes proper validation gates.
Suggestions
Move the detailed 'Relationship with context-surfing' explanation and 'What this skill produces' section into a separate INTEROP.md file, keeping only a brief summary and link in the main skill.
Trim the Purpose section — the workflow itself makes the skill's function clear, so the purpose paragraph is largely redundant.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation, particularly the 'Relationship with context-surfing' section which over-explains the distinction between scope drift and context quality drift. The 'Purpose' section also restates what the workflow already makes clear. However, most content earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, copy-paste-ready structured blocks for each phase (Intent Frame, Intent Check, Intent Resolution) with exact field names and formats. The trigger cues, drift examples, and multi-intent rules are specific and directly executable. The CLI detection command is also concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-phase workflow (Capture → Monitor → Resolution) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: user confirmation before proceeding in Phase 1, drift detection criteria in Phase 2, and resolution records in Phase 3. The multi-intent rules provide clear sequencing for complex sessions, and the precedence rule with context-surfing handles edge cases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear headers and sections, but the interoperability section is quite lengthy and inline. The relationship explanation with context-surfing and the full skill pipeline could be split into a separate reference file. For a skill of this length (~150 lines), some content would benefit from being externalized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
d6c68fa
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.