Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally actionable — dense, copy-paste-ready YAML with explicit defaults and failure rules — but it is a monolith: a ~320-line JSON schema dump duplicates prose coverage, and repeated guidance inflates token cost. Moving the schema and advanced detail into a references/ file with clearly signaled links would fix both conciseness and progressive disclosure without losing any capability.
Suggestions
Move the 'Reference documentation' JSON schema (~320 lines) into a references/schema.md file and link to it as 'Full JSON schema: See [schema.md](references/schema.md)'; the prose already covers what each property does.
De-duplicate repeated guidance: state the timeseries recommendation and cache-behavior rules once instead of twice (lines 57/165 and 436/schema cache description).
Add a short 'Quick start' sequence at the top (create metrics/<name>.yaml with version: 1, model:, timeseries:, dimensions:, measures:, explore:; then verify via rill start / dashboard preview) so the skill has an explicit ordered workflow with a verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Reference documentation' section inlines a ~320-line JSON schema dump that largely restates what the prose already covers (format presets, cache behavior, rollups), and guidance is repeated (the timeseries recommendation appears at lines 57 and 165; cache behavior explained at line 436 and again in the schema). This matches anchor 2 (several unnecessary/padded sections) rather than 3, because the schema dump alone is a major duplicated block; it is not 1 since the prose sections themselves are direct and free of basic-concept padding. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Every feature ships a copy-paste-ready YAML snippet, there is a complete annotated metrics view example, defaults are documented ('*', `humanize`, `60s`), and hard failure rules are explicit ('Do NOT set dimensions: or measures: in a derived metrics view', 'the parent must be a valid metrics view... fix the parent first'). This matches anchor 5 (fully executable guidance covering the common cases). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is reference documentation organized topically rather than a sequenced workflow: best-practice ordering guidance exists ('Start with a COUNT(*) measure as a baseline', 'add it to the parent metrics view first'), but there is no explicit step sequence with validation checkpoints for creating and verifying a metrics view. This fits anchor 3 (sequence/checkpoints implicit); not 4 because no concrete create-then-verify loop is laid out, and not 2 because the per-topic guidance is well-defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single monolithic ~830-line file with no bundle files and no references to any separate material; the full JSON schema reference clearly belongs in a separate reference file. This matches anchor 2 ('content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined'); not 3 because there are no references at all to organize, and not 1 because the body itself has clear section headers. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |