Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured instruction-only skill with executable grep commands, a concrete output template, and sensible guardrails. The main gaps are the unspecified mechanism for querying session history and a missing relevance-validation checkpoint in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a concrete command or method for checking session history and computing the correction rate in step 3.
Add a validation step confirming each surfaced learning genuinely matches the task keywords before ranking it in the briefing.
Define or drop the 'scout agent' reference in step 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: terse numbered steps, bare grep commands, one-line guardrails, and a single-sentence framing line. No concepts Claude already knows are explained and nothing meaningful to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready grep commands and a concrete output template, but step 3 ('Check session history for similar work — what was the correction rate?') gives no command or mechanism for accessing session history, and the 'scout agent' in step 5 is undefined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with an explicit no-match fallback branch and guardrails covering the empty-result case. Falls short of 5 because there is no checkpoint validating that surfaced learnings genuinely match the task before presenting them. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained skill with no bundle files and no external references, organized into clear sections (Trigger, Workflow, Output, Guardrails); the simple-skill exception applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |