Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable reference skill with excellent progressive disclosure and concrete examples. Its main weakness is a brief conceptual intro paragraph that restates knowledge Claude already has, and the absence of any sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the opening definition/analogy paragraph ('context.Context is Go's mechanism...' / 'Think of it as the session of a request') since it restates concepts Claude already knows.
If the skill is intended to guide a process (e.g., auditing a codebase for context leaks), add a short numbered workflow with an explicit validation step such as running `golangci-lint`/`go vet` before declaring work done.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient (tight numbered best-practices list, a decision table, one code block) but opens with concept restatement Claude already knows — 'context.Context is Go's mechanism for propagating...' and the 'session of a request' analogy — which the rubric penalizes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete situation→function decision table, a numbered list of specific rules, and an executable Go code example contrasting bad vs good propagation — copy-paste ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Practices are enumerated and the decision table maps situations to actions, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops; the skill is a reference compendium rather than a process. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with a 'Deep Dives' section pointing one level deep to three real reference files (cancellation.md, values-tracing.md, http-services.md), each summarized in a line, plus clearly signaled cross-references to sibling skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |