Provides linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Go projects. Covers running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and managing linter settings. Use this skill whenever the user runs linters, configures golangci-lint, asks about lint warnings or suppressions, sets up code quality tooling, or asks which linters to enable for a Go project. Also use when the user mentions golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive, or any Go linting tool.
96
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
89%
1.85xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities, provides comprehensive trigger terms covering both tool names and user intent phrases, and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. The description is well-structured, uses third person voice correctly, and carves out a distinct niche that would be easy to differentiate from other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and managing linter settings. These are clearly defined, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (linting best practices, configuration, running linters, suppressing warnings, interpreting output) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use this skill whenever...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'golangci-lint', 'go vet', 'staticcheck', 'revive', 'lint warnings', 'nolint', '.golangci.yml', 'code quality tooling', 'linters', and 'Go project'. These cover both tool names and common user phrasings. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche: Go-specific linting with named tools (golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive). Unlikely to conflict with general Go development skills or linting skills for other languages due to the specific tool and language references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality skill that is concise, actionable, and well-structured. It provides executable commands, concrete code examples, a clear troubleshooting table, and well-organized progressive disclosure to reference materials. The persona and modes at the top effectively guide Claude's behavior in different contexts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It assumes Claude knows Go and focuses on specific commands, configuration patterns, and actionable rules. No unnecessary explanations of what linting is or how Go works. Every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands, concrete Go code examples for nolint directives, copy-paste ready Makefile targets, and specific troubleshooting solutions in the common issues table. The guidance is immediately actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The development workflow is clearly sequenced (run → fix → format → commit). The modes at the top provide clear entry points for different scenarios. The legacy cleanup section provides a structured parallel approach. The nolint section has explicit rules with enforcement via nolintlint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with a concise overview, quick reference, and well-signaled one-level-deep references to linter-reference.md, nolint-directives.md, and the recommended .golangci.yml config. Cross-references to related skills are clearly listed at the end. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
b88f91d
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.