CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

golang-performance

Golang performance optimization patterns and methodology - if X bottleneck, then apply Y. Covers allocation reduction, CPU efficiency, memory layout, GC tuning, pooling, caching, and hot-path optimization. Use when profiling or benchmarks have identified a bottleneck and you need the right optimization pattern to fix it. Also use when performing performance code review to suggest improvements or benchmarks that could help identify quick performance gains. Not for measurement methodology (see golang-benchmark skill) or debugging workflow (see golang-troubleshooting skill).

92

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete capabilities, uses natural trigger terms a Go developer would use, explicitly states both what it does and when to use it, and proactively distinguishes itself from related skills with cross-references. The 'if X bottleneck, then apply Y' framing succinctly communicates the skill's methodology.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and domains: allocation reduction, CPU efficiency, memory layout, GC tuning, pooling, caching, hot-path optimization, and performance code review. The 'if X bottleneck, then apply Y' framing adds methodological specificity.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (Golang performance optimization patterns covering allocation reduction, CPU efficiency, etc.) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when profiling or benchmarks have identified a bottleneck' and 'when performing performance code review'). Also includes explicit 'Not for' exclusions referencing other skills, which strengthens the 'when' guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'performance optimization', 'profiling', 'benchmarks', 'bottleneck', 'allocation reduction', 'GC tuning', 'caching', 'hot-path', 'performance code review'. These cover a wide range of terms a Go developer would naturally use when seeking optimization help.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with explicit boundary-setting via 'Not for measurement methodology (see golang-benchmark skill) or debugging workflow (see golang-troubleshooting skill)'. This directly addresses potential overlap with related skills and creates clear delineation.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured performance optimization skill that excels at progressive disclosure and workflow clarity. The decision tree mapping pprof signals to specific reference documents is particularly effective. The main weakness is that actionable code examples are largely deferred to reference files, so the top-level skill reads more as a routing/methodology document than a hands-on guide — though this is a reasonable design choice given the breadth of topics covered.

Suggestions

Consider adding 1-2 inline executable code snippets for the most common optimization (e.g., a before/after allocation reduction example with sync.Pool or pre-allocated slice) to make the main skill more immediately actionable without requiring navigation to reference files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It assumes Claude knows Go, avoids explaining basic concepts, and every section earns its place — the decision tree, common mistakes table, and methodology steps are all high-density information. No unnecessary padding or concept explanations.

3 / 3

Actionability

The iterative methodology provides concrete commands (benchstat, go test -bench flags), and the decision tree maps signals to actions. However, the actual optimization patterns are delegated to reference files rather than shown inline — the main skill lacks executable code examples demonstrating specific optimizations. The common mistakes table provides actionable fixes but they're brief directives rather than copy-paste ready code.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The iterative optimization cycle is clearly sequenced with 7 explicit steps including baseline measurement, single-change discipline, and statistical comparison via benchstat. The 'Rule Out External Bottlenecks First' section acts as a validation checkpoint before entering the optimization loop. The feedback loop (measure → change one thing → re-measure → repeat) is explicit and well-structured.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure: the main skill provides a concise overview with decision tree, methodology, and common mistakes, then clearly signals one-level-deep references to 6 detailed deep-dive files. Cross-references to other skills are well-organized and clearly labeled. No deeply nested references or monolithic content blocks.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
samber/cc-skills-golang
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.