Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable recommendation skill with excellent progressive disclosure and concrete vetting guidance. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from repeating the stdlib-first theme and inline cross-skill promotions, and a priority-list workflow that lacks explicit validation checkpoints. Tightening the duplication and adding a concrete vetting checklist would lift the lower dimensions.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated "Standard Library First / prefer stdlib" guidance into a single authoritative section so it is stated once rather than across Core Philosophy, General Guidelines, Anti-Patterns, and the closing line.
Replace the inline "→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev" promotions with a single mention, keeping the consolidated list in the Cross-References section to cut token cost.
Add an explicit vetting checklist (e.g., check imported-by count → verify maintenance/license → review dependency footprint → confirm stdlib insufficiency) with a feedback step so the recommendation workflow has clear checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padded explanation of what libraries are), but "Standard Library First" is restated across Core Philosophy, General Guidelines, Anti-Patterns, and the closing line, and the inline "→ See ...@golang-pkg-go-dev" cross-promotions duplicate the Cross-References block — so not every token earns its place (level 3); above level 1 because the padding is mild rather than conceptual. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific guidance — "Use a module's imported-by count on pkg.go.dev", "MUST check maintenance status, license, and community adoption", and concrete pointers to the godig/gopls tools — matching the fully-actionable anchor; not the vague level 1 nor the pseudocode/incomplete level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequenced numbered "General Guidelines" list (assess requirements → check stdlib → prioritize maturity → consider complexity → think about dependencies) provides a clear priority order, but it is a recommendation priority list rather than a strict procedural workflow with explicit validation/feedback checkpoints, so it sits at level 2 rather than the "clear sequence with explicit validation steps" level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with three well-signaled one-level-deep references (stdlib.md, libraries.md, tools.md — all real files in ./references/), an external awesome-go link, and a dedicated Cross-References section, matching the "clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references" anchor; not the monolithic level 1 nor the under-signaled level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |