Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable overview that defers depth to three clearly linked reference files and provides executable code plus concrete pitfalls. Minor conciseness and validation-loop gaps keep it just short of perfect.
Suggestions
Remove the persona paragraph and the 'This skill is not exhaustive...' sentence to tighten token efficiency.
Add an explicit validate→adjust feedback loop for capacity sizing (e.g., deploy, observe hit rate via Prometheus, then resize or switch algorithm) rather than leaving validation as an implicit best practice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with actionable tables and deferred detail, though the persona line and 'This skill is not exhaustive' throat-clearing add minor tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready Go builder code, named algorithm constants, an install command, and specific method names (WithJitter, WithPrometheusMetrics, WithCopyOnRead) cover the common cases with executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The capacity-sizing section gives a clear numbered sequence and mistakes/best-practices provide guardrails, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop (only an implicit 'monitor hit rate to validate'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals three real one-level-deep references (algorithm-guide.md, production-patterns.md, api-reference.md, all present in ./references/) with clear markdown links and well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |