pt-report-creation
Creates penetration test deliverables for executive and technical audiences, including prioritized findings and remediation plans. Use when drafting, structuring, or finalizing pen test reports from collected evidence.
90
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.24xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly specifies the concrete deliverables (pen test reports with findings and remediation plans), identifies the target audiences, and provides explicit trigger conditions. The domain-specific terminology ensures it won't conflict with general documentation or security skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Creates penetration test deliverables', 'prioritized findings', 'remediation plans', and specifies audience types (executive and technical). These are concrete, actionable outputs. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Creates penetration test deliverables for executive and technical audiences, including prioritized findings and remediation plans') AND when ('Use when drafting, structuring, or finalizing pen test reports from collected evidence'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'penetration test', 'pen test reports', 'findings', 'remediation plans', 'executive', 'technical audiences', 'drafting', 'structuring', 'finalizing'. Good coverage of domain-specific terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche - penetration testing reports are distinct from general security documentation or other report types. The combination of 'pen test', 'findings', 'remediation', and 'collected evidence' creates clear, non-conflicting triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is well-structured and concise, providing a solid framework for pen test report creation. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete examples showing what good findings, severity ratings, or remediation entries look like in practice. The workflow would benefit from more explicit validation criteria.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example finding with filled-in severity, evidence, and remediation to demonstrate expected quality and format
Include explicit QA validation criteria (e.g., 'Each finding must have at least one evidence artifact referenced') rather than general guidance
Add example severity rating definitions or reference a severity framework to ensure consistent prioritization
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of what pen testing is or how reports work. Every section serves a clear purpose and assumes Claude understands security concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a clear template structure and workflow steps, but lacks concrete examples of actual findings, severity ratings, or sample remediation entries. The template placeholders are helpful but not executable without examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced, but validation checkpoints are weak. The 'Final QA pass' mentions verification but lacks explicit criteria or feedback loops for catching errors before delivery. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this size (~60 lines), the content is well-organized with clear sections. The template is appropriately inline since it's the core deliverable, and no external references are needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills
- Commit
a8ff73a
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.