Creates minimal, reproducible test cases from bug reports to confirm the defect before and after a fix. Use when a bug is reported without a failing test, when the user needs a regression test for a fix, or when the user asks to reproduce a bug as a test.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:santosomar/general-secure-coding-agent-skills --skill bug-reproduction-test-generator100
Quality
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly articulates the specific purpose (creating minimal reproducible test cases), uses natural developer terminology, and provides explicit trigger conditions covering multiple use cases. The description effectively distinguishes itself from general testing or debugging skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Creates minimal, reproducible test cases', 'confirm the defect before and after a fix'. Uses third person voice correctly and describes concrete deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Creates minimal, reproducible test cases from bug reports to confirm the defect') AND when with explicit 'Use when...' clause covering three distinct trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'bug reports', 'failing test', 'regression test', 'fix', 'reproduce a bug'. These are terms developers naturally use when discussing bug reproduction workflows. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on bug reproduction and regression testing. Distinct from general testing skills or bug fixing skills through its specific focus on creating minimal reproducible cases from bug reports. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that efficiently teaches bug reproduction test generation through clear workflows, actionable tables, and a concrete worked example. The content is lean yet comprehensive, covering edge cases and anti-patterns without unnecessary explanation. The structured approach (classify → extract triple → write/minimize → stabilize) provides clear guidance with appropriate validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place with actionable tables and minimal prose. No explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the content is dense with practical guidance without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable Python test example, specific minimization techniques, and clear decision tables. The worked example is copy-paste ready and demonstrates the exact output format. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence with explicit validation (minimize until green, stabilize before shipping). The minimization process includes feedback loops (delete → still red? → keep deleting) and the 'Do not' section provides guardrails. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (steps, tables, worked example, edge cases, do-nots). References to related skills (requirement-enhancer, bug-localization, bug-to-patch-generator) are one level deep and clearly signaled in context. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.