Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality skill that provides comprehensive, actionable guidance for deriving tests from requirements. The step-by-step workflow is clear, the worked examples are concrete and executable, and the 'Do not' section provides valuable guardrails. The only weakness is the monolithic structure—some content (like the edge cases or the detailed worked example) could potentially be split into separate reference files for better progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is dense with actionable information and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place with specific tables, examples, and decision criteria rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific test templates with ARRANGE/ACT/ASSERT structure, worked examples with exact values, decision tables for classification, and clear output formats. The Gherkin worked example is particularly copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequential process with explicit decision points (triage → extract → enumerate → derive negatives → emit). Each step has clear inputs/outputs, and the workflow includes validation through traceability maps and explicit gap flagging. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections and tables, but it's a substantial monolithic document (~200 lines). The reference to 'ambiguity-detector' suggests related skills exist, but there's no structured navigation to advanced topics or separate reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |