Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent skill that demonstrates rather than explains. The worked OAuth example is particularly effective at showing the expected transformation. The density targets and 'Do not' section provide clear guardrails. Minor weakness: the actual summarization workflow could be more explicitly sequenced.
Suggestions
Add an explicit numbered workflow: 1. Read spec end-to-end, 2. Mark normative statements, 3. Group by chosen axis, 4. Verify compression ratio, 5. Check all MUSTs have section refs
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No explanation of what requirements documents are or why summarization matters. Tables are dense and scannable. The worked example demonstrates rather than explains. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete output format template, specific density targets (20:1 compression), exact signal words to look for, and a complete worked example showing input→output transformation. Copy-paste ready structure. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is implicit rather than explicit: read spec → identify normative statements → organize by axis → format output. The 'Do not summarize a spec you haven't read end-to-end' hint suggests a workflow but doesn't sequence the steps with validation checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with appropriate length (~100 lines). Well-organized with clear sections (normative vs informative, organizing, worked example, do not, output format). No need for external references given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |