frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:sc30gsw/claude-code-customes --skill frontend-design72
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillEvaluation — 96%
↑ 1.09xAgent success when using this skill
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has a clear structure with explicit 'Use when' guidance, which is a strength. However, it lacks specific concrete actions beyond 'generates code' and could benefit from more natural trigger terms that users commonly use. The distinctiveness relies on qualitative claims ('high design quality', 'polished') rather than concrete differentiators.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, build interactive forms, style with modern CSS'
Expand trigger terms to include common variations: 'UI', 'website', 'HTML/CSS', 'landing page', 'dashboard', 'React component'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (frontend interfaces) and some actions (build web components, pages, applications, generates code), but lacks comprehensive specific actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, style with CSS'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces') and when ('Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords ('web components', 'pages', 'applications', 'frontend') but misses common variations users might say like 'UI', 'website', 'HTML', 'CSS', 'React', 'landing page', or 'dashboard'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on 'high design quality' and avoiding 'generic AI aesthetics' provides some distinction, but 'web components, pages, or applications' could overlap with general coding skills or other frontend-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides strong conceptual direction for creating distinctive frontend interfaces and successfully communicates design philosophy. However, it lacks concrete code examples, executable patterns, and explicit workflow validation steps that would make it immediately actionable. The guidance is more inspirational than instructional.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 concrete, copy-paste ready code examples showing the principles in action (e.g., a CSS snippet demonstrating the typography/color approach, a React component with Motion animations)
Include a brief validation checklist: 'Before delivering, verify: distinctive font choices, cohesive color palette, at least one memorable interaction, no generic patterns'
Consider splitting detailed framework-specific guidance (React with Motion, vanilla HTML/CSS) into separate reference files linked from the main skill
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration, particularly in the design philosophy sections. Phrases like 'Claude is capable of extraordinary creative work' and repeated emphasis on avoiding 'AI slop' could be trimmed without losing actionable value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides conceptual guidance and design principles but lacks concrete, executable code examples. The skill describes what to do (use CSS variables, Motion library, staggered reveals) but doesn't show copy-paste ready implementations or specific code patterns. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Has a logical flow from 'Design Thinking' to implementation guidelines, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. No steps for testing, reviewing output quality, or iterating on designs. The process is implied rather than explicitly sequenced. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections (Design Thinking, Frontend Aesthetics Guidelines), but everything is inline in one file. For a skill of this complexity, references to separate files for specific frameworks (React patterns, CSS examples) or aesthetic templates would improve navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.