CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seo-keyword-cluster-builder

SEO keyword clustering with topic organization, content hub architecture, internal linking strategies. Use for content strategy, keyword research, pillar page structures, or encountering cluster organization, hub architecture, internal linking errors.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/seo-keyword-cluster-builder/skills/seo-keyword-cluster-builder/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body offers real value via worked examples and copy-paste templates, but it is bloated with general SEO knowledge Claude already has, keeps everything inline with no reference files, and leaves the core clustering method under-specified. Tightening and splitting would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Trim sections that re-teach general SEO knowledge Claude already has — search-intent definitions, anchor-text do/don'ts, the Technical SEO checklist, and the meta 'Best Practices'/'Philosophy' sections — to cut the ~470 lines of padding.

Split the large inline Detailed Output Template, Common Clustering Patterns, and Content Calendar Template into separate reference files (e.g. templates.md, patterns.md) linked one level deep from a concise SKILL.md overview.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the clustering workflow (e.g. 'verify clusters are mutually exclusive before building architecture') and define the actual clustering method instead of the vague 'Group by semantic similarity'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~470-line body re-teaches general SEO Claude already knows (search-intent definitions, anchor-text do/don'ts, a technical-SEO checklist, meta 'Best Practices'/'Philosophy' sections), but also carries genuine actionable template content, so it is verbose rather than purely explanatory.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete templates and a worked project-management example exist, but the core clustering action is abstract ('Group by semantic similarity') with no defined method or threshold, leaving key implementation details missing.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequenced steps (Response Approach, Clustering Process) and an Implementation Checklist are present, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops within the clustering workflow itself.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Reasonably sectioned but entirely monolithic with no bundle files; large blocks that should be separate references (Detailed Output Template, clustering patterns, content calendar) are all inline.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description: third-person voice, multiple concrete capabilities, and an explicit 'Use for' trigger clause covering natural SEO terms. It cleanly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — 'SEO keyword clustering', 'topic organization', 'content hub architecture', 'internal linking strategies' — matching the anchor for several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what ('SEO keyword clustering with...') and when via an explicit 'Use for content strategy, keyword research...' trigger clause, satisfying both halves.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are well covered: 'keyword research', 'content strategy', 'pillar page structures', 'cluster organization', 'hub architecture', 'internal linking'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear SEO content-architecture niche with domain-specific triggers unlikely to collide with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
secondsky/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.