Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success. Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:secondsky/claude-skills --skill verification-before-completion88
Quality
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.00xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/verification-before-completion/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.mdDiscovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description with strong completeness and clear trigger conditions. The 'Use when...' clause effectively identifies the specific workflow moment this skill applies to. The main weakness is that the capabilities could be more specific about what verification commands are run.
Suggestions
Add specific verification actions like 'run tests, check linting, validate builds' to improve specificity
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (verification) and some actions ('run verification commands', 'confirm output'), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'run tests', 'check linting', 'validate builds', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success') and when ('Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs') with explicit triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'complete', 'fixed', 'passing', 'committing', 'PRs'. These are terms developers naturally use when finishing work. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on the specific moment before claiming completion or committing. The trigger context ('about to claim work is complete') is distinct and unlikely to conflict with general testing or code review skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong skill that provides clear, actionable verification workflows with concrete commands and explicit validation checkpoints. The content effectively communicates the importance of verification with practical examples. Minor weaknesses include some redundancy in messaging and a slightly monolithic structure that could benefit from better progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Consider consolidating the 'Red Flags' and 'Rationalization Prevention' sections to reduce redundancy while preserving the key warnings
Move detailed verification patterns (regression testing, agent delegation) to a separate PATTERNS.md file and reference from the main skill
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy - the same point about verification is made multiple ways across sections. Tables like 'Rationalization Prevention' and 'Common Failures' add value but some overlap exists between sections. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable bash commands for all common verification scenarios (tests, build, lint, type check). The gate function gives a clear 5-step process, and the key patterns section shows exact input/output examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Gate Function' provides an explicit 5-step workflow with clear validation checkpoints and branching logic (If NO/If YES). The regression test pattern explicitly shows the red-green verification cycle with revert step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections and tables, but it's a monolithic document that could benefit from splitting detailed patterns into separate files. For a skill of this length (~150 lines), some content like the rationalization table could be externalized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.