CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

devops-infra

DevOps Infrastructure Agent. 인프라 관리, 스케일링, 백업, 네트워크 설정을 담당합니다. 인프라, 스케일링(scale), 백업(backup), 네트워크 관련 요청 시 사용됩니다.

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i github:shaul1991/shaul-agents-plugin --skill devops-infra
What are skills?

84

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/devops-infra/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Review
Evals

Discovery

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a reasonably well-structured skill description that clearly communicates both purpose and trigger conditions. It uses third person voice correctly and provides bilingual trigger terms. However, the capabilities listed are somewhat high-level categories rather than specific concrete actions, and the broad scope could lead to conflicts with more specialized infrastructure-related skills.

Suggestions

Add more specific concrete actions like 'configure auto-scaling groups', 'set up VPN connections', 'manage container orchestration' to improve specificity

Consider narrowing the scope or adding distinguishing details to reduce potential overlap with other infrastructure-related skills (e.g., specify cloud platforms like AWS/GCP/Azure)

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (infrastructure) and lists some actions (infrastructure management, scaling, backup, network configuration), but these are fairly high-level categories rather than concrete specific actions like 'configure load balancers' or 'set up VPN tunnels'.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('인프라 관리, 스케일링, 백업, 네트워크 설정을 담당합니다') and when ('인프라, 스케일링(scale), 백업(backup), 네트워크 관련 요청 시 사용됩니다') with explicit trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes good natural keywords users would say: '인프라' (infrastructure), '스케일링/scale', '백업/backup', '네트워크' (network). Provides both Korean and English terms in parentheses, covering common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

While DevOps/infrastructure is a specific domain, terms like 'network' and 'backup' could overlap with other skills (e.g., database backup skills, network security skills). The scope is broad enough to potentially conflict with more specialized infrastructure skills.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid infrastructure skill with excellent conciseness and actionability - commands are executable and the content respects Claude's intelligence. The main weaknesses are in workflow clarity (missing validation steps for backup operations and vague scaling guidance) and progressive disclosure (could benefit from splitting detailed procedures into separate files).

Suggestions

Add validation steps after backup commands (e.g., verify backup file size, test restore to temp database)

Include explicit feedback loops in emergency procedures (e.g., 'If health check fails after rollback, escalate to...')

Either provide concrete scaling commands/configs or remove the vague scaling section that just lists considerations

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Content is lean and efficient with no unnecessary explanations. Commands are presented directly without explaining what Docker, PostgreSQL, or Caddy are. Every section provides actionable commands without padding.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable bash commands throughout - disk cleanup, backup/restore, network inspection, and Caddy management are all copy-paste ready with concrete examples and proper syntax.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Emergency procedures list steps but lack explicit validation checkpoints. The backup section shows commands but doesn't include verification steps (e.g., checking backup integrity). Scaling section is vague with no concrete workflow.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear sections and a helpful infrastructure diagram, but everything is inline in one file. For a skill of this size (~100 lines), separating detailed backup procedures or emergency runbooks into linked files would improve navigation.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.