Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill content reads more like a job description than actionable guidance for Claude. It defines a role and lists responsibilities but provides no concrete instructions, templates, decision frameworks, or examples that would enable Claude to actually perform CTO-level tasks. The content is too abstract to be useful.
Suggestions
Add concrete templates or frameworks for technology roadmap creation (e.g., a markdown template with sections for current state, target state, milestones)
Include specific decision-making criteria or checklists for architecture decisions (e.g., scalability considerations, security requirements, cost analysis)
Provide example outputs showing what a completed tech strategy document should look like
Add workflow steps for how to approach each responsibility (e.g., '1. Gather requirements from stakeholders, 2. Assess current architecture, 3. Draft proposal...')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is brief but lacks substance - it's concise by being vague rather than by being efficient. The bullet points are high-level labels without actionable detail. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides only abstract role descriptions and vague responsibilities like '기술 로드맵 수립' without any concrete guidance, templates, commands, or examples of how to actually perform these tasks. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow or process is defined. Lists responsibilities without explaining how to execute them, what sequence to follow, or what validation steps to take for strategic decisions. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References an output location (docs/tech-strategy/) but provides no links to detailed guidance, templates, or examples. The structure exists but lacks useful navigation to supporting materials. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |